1020 2011-05-03 01:35:25 +0000 LSB4.1: LSB test suite need libQtOpenGL.so for hardware ppc, x86 and x86-64 2011-07-08 15:33:16 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core graphics 1.0-alpha All x86_64 RESOLVED FIXED Undecided critical 1.1 M1 1 Xiaofeng.yan Xiaofeng.yan jiajun.xu meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher sgw --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 13537 0 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-03 01:35:25 +0000 Qt4 can't be test for hardware platform ppc(mpc8315e),x86 and x86-64 without library libQtOpenGL.so 13538 1 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-03 01:48:37 +0000 This bugs can be solved by the following steps 1 for ppc(mpc8315e-rdb) PC$ vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc ...... QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" +QT_GLFLAGS_mpc8315e-rdb = "-opengl" QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" inherit qt4x11 2 for x86 and x86-64 PC$vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc ...... QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" +QT_GLFLAGS_specific-hardware-platfrom = "-opengl" QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so 13541 2 dexuan.cui 2011-05-03 06:53:16 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > This bugs can be solved by the following steps > 1 for ppc(mpc8315e-rdb) > PC$ vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > ...... > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > +QT_GLFLAGS_mpc8315e-rdb = "-opengl" > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > inherit qt4x11 > 2 for x86 and x86-64 > PC$vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > ...... > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > +QT_GLFLAGS_specific-hardware-platfrom = "-opengl" > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. And you'll test on ppc. After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. Am I correct? 13544 3 dexuan.cui 2011-05-03 07:51:36 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This bugs can be solved by the following steps > > 1 for ppc(mpc8315e-rdb) > > PC$ vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > ...... > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > +QT_GLFLAGS_mpc8315e-rdb = "-opengl" > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > inherit qt4x11 > > 2 for x86 and x86-64 > > PC$vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > ...... > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > +QT_GLFLAGS_specific-hardware-platfrom = "-opengl" > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so > Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. > And you'll test on ppc. > After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. > Am I correct? BTW: can we test it using qemux86 and qemux86-64? I guess not since qemu doesn't support opengl now(?) What x86 and x86-64 target should I build? I know BSP sugarbay is x86-64 and BSP n450 seems x86. Can I test on them? how to test them? Please clarify the questions since I'm not very clear about the background. :-) 13553 4 jiajun.xu 2011-05-03 17:12:51 +0000 > > > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > > > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > > > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so > > Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. > > And you'll test on ppc. > > After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. > > Am I correct? > BTW: can we test it using qemux86 and qemux86-64? I guess not since qemu > doesn't support opengl now(?) > What x86 and x86-64 target should I build? > I know BSP sugarbay is x86-64 and BSP n450 seems x86. Can I test on them? how > to test them? Currenly we are doing LSB test on jasperforest(x86-64). I think sugarbay and n450 should be OK also. But the problem is that if we need to enable opengl for all meta-intel BSPs. Xiaofeng has a doc for LSB test suite setup, I could send you by email. > Please clarify the questions since I'm not very clear about the background. :-) 13554 5 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-03 18:57:31 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This bugs can be solved by the following steps > > 1 for ppc(mpc8315e-rdb) > > PC$ vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > ...... > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > +QT_GLFLAGS_mpc8315e-rdb = "-opengl" > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > inherit qt4x11 > > 2 for x86 and x86-64 > > PC$vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > ...... > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > +QT_GLFLAGS_specific-hardware-platfrom = "-opengl" > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so > > Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. > And you'll test on ppc. We make lsb test on ppc and have generated a libQtOpenGl.so on mpc8315e-rdb and it's ok here. > After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. > yes if you enable this configure on .bb file. I think it will pass lsb test. > Am I correct? 13555 6 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-03 19:04:57 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > This bugs can be solved by the following steps > > > 1 for ppc(mpc8315e-rdb) > > > PC$ vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > > ...... > > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > > +QT_GLFLAGS_mpc8315e-rdb = "-opengl" > > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > > inherit qt4x11 > > > 2 for x86 and x86-64 > > > PC$vim /media/D/poky/git/poky/meta/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free.inc > > > ...... > > > QT_GLFLAGS ?= "-no-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemux86 = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_emenlow = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_atom-pc = "-opengl" > > > QT_GLFLAGS_qemuppc = "-opengl" > > > +QT_GLFLAGS_specific-hardware-platfrom = "-opengl" > > > QT_CONFIG_FLAGS += "-no-xinerama -no-xkb ${QT_GLFLAGS}" > > > QT_BASE_NAME ?= "qt4" > > > QT_BASE_LIB ?= "libqt" > > > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > > > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > > > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so > > Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. > > And you'll test on ppc. > > After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. > > Am I correct? > > BTW: can we test it using qemux86 and qemux86-64? I guess not since qemu > doesn't support opengl now(?) > You can't test it on qemu platfrom because we report lsb test results to Linux Foundation with specific hardware platform > What x86 and x86-64 target should I build? > I know BSP sugarbay is x86-64 and BSP n450 seems x86. Can I test on them? how > to test them? I view email and jiajun will give you the test document. If you have any question for lsb test. please tell me. > Please clarify the questions since I'm not very clear about the background. :-) 13556 7 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-03 19:09:05 +0000 (In reply to comment #4) > > > > Because wind river have no x86 and x86-64 hardware platform, so please Intel > > > > make patches for QtOpenGL to OE-CORE. I can enable them for x86 and x86-64 but > > > > I can't test them without hardware. LSB could delay if no libQtOpenGL.so > > > Xiaofeng, my understanding is: I only need to test on x86 and x86-64. > > > And you'll test on ppc. > > > After our testings are done, the bug will be fixed. > > > Am I correct? > > BTW: can we test it using qemux86 and qemux86-64? I guess not since qemu > > doesn't support opengl now(?) > > What x86 and x86-64 target should I build? > > I know BSP sugarbay is x86-64 and BSP n450 seems x86. Can I test on them? how > > to test them? > > Currenly we are doing LSB test on jasperforest(x86-64). I think sugarbay and > n450 should be OK also. But the problem is that if we need to enable opengl for > all meta-intel BSPs. > > Xiaofeng has a doc for LSB test suite setup, I could send you by email. > Hi jiajun, Thank you for you giving me help to make lsb test on x86 and x86-64. If you build a lsb-image for yourself, you should enable DISTRO="poky-lsb" to instead of DISTRO="poky" in file build/conf/local.conf > > Please clarify the questions since I'm not very clear about the background. :-) 13669 8 Xiaofeng.yan 2011-05-11 00:29:48 +0000 Saul have re-factored changes to enable configuration for qtopengl on target platform. The next is detailed steps pc$vi /media/D/poky/git/poky.git/meta-yocto/recipes-qt/qt4/qt4-x11-free_4.7.2.bbappend +QT_GLFLAGS_jasperforest = "-opengl" pc$vi meta/recipes-extended/tasks/task-core-lsb.bb PACKAGES = "\ task-core-lsb \ ...... + task-core-lsb-graphic-add_jaspreforest \ " ALLOW_EMPTY = "1" RDEPENDS_task-core-lsb = "\ ...... + task-core-lsb-graphic-add_jaspreforest \ +RDEPENDS_task-core-lsb-graphic-jaspreforest = "\ + libqtopengl4 \ 13769 9 dexuan.cui 2011-05-12 18:55:47 +0000 I'm building sugarbay (x86-64) and n450 (x86) images and trying to test this. 14645 10 sgw 2011-07-08 15:33:16 +0000 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=d988cfbb472e9246f7a8020877da773e7601c119