<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>10698</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2016-11-21 16:45:01 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>meta-intel doesn&apos;t support x32</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2017-02-14 22:02:14 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>BSPs</product>
          <component>bsps-meta-intel</component>
          <version>2.2</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>MOVED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>Need to further evaluate and possibly file more bugs</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.3 M3</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Saul Wold">sgw</assigned_to>
          
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>68460</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2016-11-21 16:45:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If I enable x32 for intel-corei7-64 with DEFAULTTUNE = &quot;x86-64-x32&quot;:

$ bitbake core-image-sato
ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES &apos;virtual/kernel&apos;
ERROR: linux-yocto-rt PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto-dev PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto-tiny PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto-rt PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-dummy PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel set to linux-yocto, not linux-dummy
ERROR: linux-yocto-tiny PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto-tiny PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: linux-yocto-rt PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine intel-corei7-64 (not in COMPATIBLE_MACHINE)
ERROR: Required build target &apos;core-image-sato&apos; has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: [&apos;core-image-sato&apos;, &apos;virtual/kernel&apos;]</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>70705</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Saul Wold">sgw</who>
    <bug_when>2017-02-14 22:02:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>There are other bugs that have been opened to replace this one that are more specific.

x32 is down to a small handful of reported failures.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>