11233 2017-03-24 09:09:50 +0000 Improve test_archiver_allows_to_filter_on_recipe_name runtime 2017-04-26 21:33:14 +0000 1 1 10 QA/Testing Build Testing general unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED INVALID Medium+ enhancement 2.4 M1 10874 1 jku leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez benjamin.esquivel joshuagloe --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 71679 0 jku 2017-03-24 09:09:50 +0000 I'm filing this because test_archiver_allows_to_filter_on_recipe_name (oeqa.selftest.archiver.Archiver) seems to take a long time considering what it is testing. I'm not a subject matter expert so if the runtime is actually reasonable, please close. The test is often seen to take over 8 minutes (~3% of the whole selftest time) to finish. Examples: https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-oe-selftest/builds/185/steps/Running%20oe-selftest/logs/stdio, https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-oe-selftest/builds/185/steps/Running%20oe-selftest/logs/stdio) . Improving this would have clear effect on autobuilder usability. The examples were done after commit cf8fcba8e7f5 "don't build an image for a basic test" which tried to improve this. There is fairly large variance on the results (sometimes the test seems to 'only' take 4 minutes). 72880 1 leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez 2017-04-26 21:33:14 +0000 There is no way to reduce times on this case unless smaller targets are used (busybox and zlib) which I dont think times will greatly reduced. Marking as resolved/invalid.