11304 2017-04-06 19:09:29 +0000 Create automated testcases for system update 2017-07-03 07:18:49 +0000 1 1 10 QA/Testing Test Plans/Suite test-plans/suite 2.4 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Low normal Future 9660 9783 1 libertad.gonzalez.de.la.cruz patrick.ohly benjamin.esquivel patrick.ohly --- --- Don't know oldest_to_newest 72152 0 libertad.gonzalez.de.la.cruz 2017-04-06 19:09:29 +0000 Create an UpdateTest base class which is completely independent from swupd. To do the necessary swupd-specific operations, it should call empty stub functions. The common part in UpdateTest is preparing the OS content, including such special cases as updating the kernel, adding/removing/replacing files, changing file permissions, changing item types (file <-> symlink), changing item attributes (xattrs!). Then a SwupdUpdateTest class sub-classes UpdateTest and provides the missing functionality. 73072 1 patrick.ohly 2017-05-05 07:18:06 +0000 Let's use this issue here to track the UpdateTest base class. The older bug #9783 can be used for the swupd-specific parts. Note that we need to get the common part done for 2.4, because it blocks bug #11467. 73151 2 patrick.ohly 2017-05-09 19:55:21 +0000 Libertad, let's discuss whether this issue really can be moved from 2.4 to Future. We need something for 2.4. 73238 3 libertad.gonzalez.de.la.cruz 2017-05-12 15:48:56 +0000 The reason I set this to the future is because of the uncertainty that swupd will be the official update feature supported by Yocto now and in the future. If what I think I know is not correct then I can work on this for 2.4. 73243 4 patrick.ohly 2017-05-12 18:01:29 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > The reason I set this to the future is because of the uncertainty that swupd > will be the official update feature supported by Yocto now and in the > future. If what I think I know is not correct then I can work on this for > 2.4. See comment #1. I'd like to use this issue to track the base class for image update testing and bug #9783 for the swupd-specific part. Following that logic, this bug here is needed for 2.4 - the sooner, the better. 74706 5 patrick.ohly 2017-07-03 07:18:49 +0000 I needed a solution for OSTree, so I wrote one. See https://github.com/intel/intel-iot-refkit/blob/master/meta-refkit-core/lib/oeqa/selftest/systemupdate/systemupdatebase.py We do not need this in OE-core. If there is interest in moving it there, we can still do that later. Therefore I consider this issue resolved.