11345 2017-04-12 18:27:08 +0000 Support both MUSL and x32 as a build option combination 2017-10-01 09:21:20 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 2.3 x86 Multiple RESOLVED MOVED LET Medium enhancement 2.4 1 sgw swee.aun.khor meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher --- New (Never tested) Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 72399 0 sgw 2017-04-12 18:27:08 +0000 Currently we have both MUSL and x32 support, but they are independant, MUSL is working on x32 support and is currently experimental. We should ensure that the meta-data and bbclasses are prepared for being able to build a combination of both. A starting point would be to build for MUSL and corei7, then test with changing the DEFAULTTUNE TCLIBC = "musl" MACHINE="intel-corei7-64" #DEFAULTTUNE = "corei7-64-x32" There will be both infrastructure changes (bbclass) and possible bug fixes to various projects (upstream and recipes). 72506 1 rebecca.swee.fun.chang 2017-04-13 23:33:24 +0000 Need to rework on review comments. 73438 2 swee.aun.khor 2017-05-23 01:27:13 +0000 Started to look into this issue by referred to gnux32 implementation. Made some changes on siteinfo.bbclass and insane.bbclass to support muslx32 for infrastructure change such as osinfo and targetinfo. Do some fixes on openssl, libffi and perl compilations errors. Currently having systemd-boot do_compile error. 77253 3 swee.aun.khor 2017-10-01 09:21:20 +0000 Able to build core-image-minimal image with muslx32 currently. However, there are still couple recipes having compilation error with muslx32 when performed bitbake world. Created separate Bugzilla bug to keep track those recipes that failing with muslx32 compilation during bitbake world. webkitgtk Bug 12118 Boost Bug 12119 Gdb Bug 12120 Qat16 Bug 12121 Systemd-boot Bug 12122 acpica Bug 12123