1187 2011-06-22 00:44:27 +0000 [sugarbay] parport_pc probe fail of 00:0b 2011-07-18 19:15:48 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BSPs bsps-configuration unspecified x86 Multiple VERIFIED FIXED Low normal 1.1 1 wenhuax.fan dvhart bruce.ashfield dvhart ke.yu wenhuax.fan yp.bsp.watcher yp.watcher --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 14377 0 wenhuax.fan 2011-06-22 00:44:27 +0000 There is no such error in Yocto 1.1 M1 testing. Commit Information: Tree/Branch: Poky/Master Poky Commit: 2163461ec94528ecf046a04edc5db3d2dd3a6b8b Meta Branch: Master Meta Commit: 76d1178ba1a43cf6457c89717134aeb9f1275fae Image location: http://autobuilder02.pokylinux.org/sugarbay-master/nightly/20110617-1/machines/sugarbay/x86_32/core-image-sato-sdk-live-sugarbay-20110618064833.hddimg.bz2 The error log is as below: ########## FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor PC87306 parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x0378-0x037b] parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x0278-0x027b] parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x03bc-0x03bf] parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x0378-0x037b] parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x0278-0x027b] parport_pc 00:0b: [io 0x03bc-0x03bf] parport_pc 00:0b: unable to assign resources parport_pc: probe of 00:0b failed with error -16 ########## 14394 1 dvhart 2011-06-23 15:01:12 +0000 Bruce, have there been any relevant base or standard config changes that might cause this? Tom, any relevant sugarbay changes? 14397 2 bruce.ashfield 2011-06-23 17:21:23 +0000 Nothing that hits the sugarbay. We've got quite a few meta changes, but they have all been in the tree for sometime, and none are near parport support. so no great ideas here. 14768 3 wenhuax.fan 2011-07-18 19:14:57 +0000 There is no such issue in Yocto1.1 M2 RC3 testing. Tree/Branch: Poky/1.1_M2 Poky Commit id: fa4bcfdb73167f8159b88e5a4d711c0d37627a70 Image location: http://autobuilder03.jf.intel.com/crownbay-1.1_M2/nightly/20110717-1/machines/crownbay/x86_32/core-image-sato-sdk-live-crownbay-20110717223745.hddimg.bz2 14769 4 wenhuax.fan 2011-07-18 19:15:48 +0000 Verify this bug.