12023 2017-08-31 23:45:31 +0000 "bitbake-layers show-layers" doesn't show layer if it doesn't append itself to BBFILE_COLLECTIONS 2021-08-17 04:05:56 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BitBake bitbake unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED NOTABUG Medium+ minor 3.4 M3 1 caio.oliveira unassigned caio.oliveira jay.shen.teoh mshah poky.bs.watcher poky.watcher randy.macleod rebecca.swee.fun.chang --- --- Don't know oldest_to_newest 76431 0 caio.oliveira 2017-08-31 23:45:31 +0000 If I create a layer with recipes, but without adding BBFILE_COLLECTIONS (and a corresponding BBFILE_PATTERN_name), bitbake -s shows the recipes as expected, but "bitbake-layers show-layers" do not show the layers. "bitbake show-recipes" shows the recipes but with a layer as "?". I'm a bit unsure whether this is expected behavior or not. Tested with git at "main: Attempt to gain bitbake.lock rather than just waiting" 8a60106c6f7d586c793b965c5e9460b6016fab15. 77884 1 rebecca.swee.fun.chang 2017-10-31 06:27:12 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > If I create a layer with recipes, but without adding BBFILE_COLLECTIONS (and > a corresponding BBFILE_PATTERN_name), bitbake -s shows the recipes as > expected, but "bitbake-layers show-layers" do not show the layers. "bitbake > show-recipes" shows the recipes but with a layer as "?". > > I'm a bit unsure whether this is expected behavior or not. > > Tested with git at "main: Attempt to gain bitbake.lock rather than just > waiting" 8a60106c6f7d586c793b965c5e9460b6016fab15. Ideally, it is recommended to use bitbake-layers command to create a layer. It will help you to populate all the required configurations that you will need in your meta layer layer.conf file. 89893 2 mshah 2021-04-08 05:16:26 +0000 Is there any work to do for this bug? -- Milan Shah 91191 3 jay.shen.teoh 2021-08-17 04:05:56 +0000 Seems like there's no workaround for this issue. Developers are recommended to use bitbake-layers command to create a new layer with a basic directory structure to avoid any unexpected behavior.