13387 2019-06-10 13:30:06 +0000 binutils on target broken with gcc 9 on mips 2022-04-21 15:51:49 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core oe-core other 0.0.0 Other Multiple RESOLVED OBSOLETE Medium major 4.0 0 bunk unassigned akuster randy.macleod --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 84130 0 bunk 2019-06-10 13:30:06 +0000 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=6c37069a244c0430ccf0014427023bb174bf47b2 http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2019-June/200040.html These are two different issues reported to be caused on mips by the gcc 8 -> 9 switch. Someone should debug and forward upstream them if mips should use gcc 9 in Yocto 2.8, otherwise the safest workaround might be to use gcc 8 on mips for now. 84177 1 randy.macleod 2019-06-13 14:43:14 +0000 We'll track this first issue since it's related to oe-core. Khem can you handle the second issue in meta-oe? 84182 2 bunk 2019-06-13 14:55:03 +0000 The second issue looks like as if the root cause would be gcc 9 generating code that binutils rejects. It could be something mundane like the common -mxgot issue (the error message does not match this one specifically), but my guess would be that there is a toolchain bug that has to be fixed in oe-core. 84196 3 raj.khem 2019-06-13 17:46:31 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > We'll track this first issue since it's related to oe-core. > Khem can you handle the second issue in meta-oe? this is not reproducible on real mips board that I had access to. Secondly, needing toolchain on target for mips is more or less a rare case. 91974 4 randy.macleod 2021-11-11 16:20:52 +0000 reopen if this happens on real mips hardware with a modern toolchain. 93160 5 randy.macleod 2022-04-21 15:51:49 +0000 Let's try this again since last time something went wrong: reopen if this happens on real mips hardware with a modern toolchain.