<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>13512</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2019-09-10 21:09:30 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>reproducible QA: Build core-image-sato reproducibly</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2020-02-22 00:28:22 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>OE-Core</product>
          <component>core</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>3.1</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Joshua Watt">JPEWhacker</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Sakib Sajal">sakib.sajal</assigned_to>
          <cc>meta.mr.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>randy.macleod</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
    
    <cc>ross.burton</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>84916</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Watt">JPEWhacker</who>
    <bug_when>2019-09-10 21:09:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>core-image-sato should be built as part of the reproducible build QA test for better recipe coverage.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>84991</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2019-09-17 09:15:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I did a test build.  These are the recipes that fail:

jpeg-tools_2.0.3-r0_amd64.deb 
libatspi-src_2.32.1-r0_amd64.deb 
libical-dbg_3.0.5-r0_amd64.deb 
libical_3.0.5-r0_amd64.deb 
libjpeg-dbg_2.0.3-r0_amd64.deb 
libjpeg62_2.0.3-r0_amd64.deb 
librsvg-2-2_2.40.20-r0_amd64.deb 
librsvg-2-dbg_2.40.20-r0_amd64.deb 
libtag-c0_1.11.1-r0_amd64.deb 
libtag-dbg_1.11.1-r0_amd64.deb 
libturbojpeg0_2.0.3-r0_amd64.deb 
pango-src_1.44.6-r0_amd64.deb</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86399</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2020-02-11 03:34:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think that libical is the only remaining reproducible build problem package when I run:
   oe-selftest -r reproducible.ReproducibleTests.test_reproducible_builds
but I only see this one unassigned defect mentioning it. 

I noticed that Richard and Armin were celebrating the abundance of working builds. Am I missing something? I did check in master-next for a change to libical.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86400</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Watt">JPEWhacker</who>
    <bug_when>2020-02-11 04:14:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think this bug predates us making individual bugs for each non reproducible package. I also thought that we were already testing core-image-sato on the autobuilder and probably haven&apos;t seen if any iCal issues there. If you are seeing problems, I think a new bug would need to be made.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86410</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2020-02-12 04:16:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Sakib is going to try to reproduce the libical problem that I saw and debug it if needed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86495</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2020-02-19 21:57:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We finally figured out the local.conf entries needed to reproduce the issue in another account. 

In the -dev package, a file:
   /usr/lib/cmake/LibIcal/LibIcalTargets.cmake
has some host contamination:
   INTERFACE_COMPILE_OPTIONS &quot;-I/ala-lpggp31/rmacleod/src/distro/yocto/b/rust-jan6/reproducibleA/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/libical/3.0.7-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/include/glib-2.0;-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include;-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\&quot;libical-glib\&quot;;-DLIBICAL_GLIB_COMPILATION&quot; 

So Sakib is going to extend the sed filter in libical&apos;s recipe to 
fix that.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>86552</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2020-02-22 00:28:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The last known issue, with libical-dev is fixed by:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=9b3aaa03ace3975b2d6fb9a707b4b791d4f0f916</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>