15638 2024-10-29 14:55:08 +0000 bitbake-getvar doesn't have identical output to bitbake -e 2024-11-19 16:23:14 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BitBake bitbake 5.1 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15652 Medium+ normal 5.2 M1 1 ross.burton yoann.congal adrian.freihofer poky.bs.watcher poky.watcher randy.macleod yoann.congal --- --- Don't know oldest_to_newest 100057 0 ross.burton 2024-10-29 14:55:08 +0000 $ bitbake-getvar DISTRO_FEATURES --value acl alsa bluetooth debuginfod ext2 ipv4 ipv6 pcmcia usbgadget usbhost wifi xattr nfs zeroconf pci 3g nfc x11 vfat seccomp opengl ptest multiarch wayland vulkan sysvinit $ bitbake -e |grep DISTRO_FEATURES= DISTRO_FEATURES="acl alsa bluetooth debuginfod ext2 ipv4 ipv6 pcmcia usbgadget usbhost wifi xattr nfs zeroconf pci 3g nfc x11 vfat seccomp opengl ptest multiarch wayland vulkan sysvinit pulseaudio gobject-introspection-data ldconfig" Notably, the backfill hasn't happened. 100058 1 adrian.freihofer 2024-10-29 15:44:23 +0000 It's also interesting that bitbake-getvar behaves differently if called with -r or without (as in the example here). With -r it's more verbose than without. 100059 2 richard.purdie 2024-10-29 17:46:27 +0000 cooker.py in the -e codepath does: data.expandKeys(envdata) parse.ast.runAnonFuncs(envdata) on the data. Adding the expandKeys is straightforward enough for bitbake-getvar but the runAnonFuncs will need a new API call adding for tinfoil to use. 100145 3 yoann.congal 2024-11-12 23:13:51 +0000 Patches sent: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16793 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16794 https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/207069 100176 4 yoann.congal 2024-11-14 18:28:18 +0000 (In reply to Yoann Congal from comment #3) > Patches sent: > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16793 > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16794 > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/207069 Those patches make runqemu.QemuTest.test_qemu_can_boot_nfs_and_shutdown fail. Reverting the getvar patch fix the issue. I can reproduce locally, I'll investigate. Idea from #yp-infra: [23:18:41] <RP> yocton: I think something in the testing code uses bitbake-getvar to get a value and your fix is breaking it! [23:19:11] <yocton> Same idea. I'll try to locate this getvar call 100177 5 yoann.congal 2024-11-14 18:29:45 +0000 Failure log with patch applied: https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/28/builds/402/steps/12/logs/stdio https://valkyrie.yoctoproject.org/#/builders/28/builds/402/steps/12/logs/stdio 100178 6 yoann.congal 2024-11-14 22:25:21 +0000 v2 sent [PATCH v2 1/2] tinfoil: add new "finalizeData" API https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16801 [PATCH v2 2/2] bitbake-getvar: use finalizeData tinfoil API to get identical result to "bitbake -e" https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/16802 100211 7 yoann.congal 2024-11-19 15:41:17 +0000 Merged: bitbake: tinfoil: add new "finalizeData" API - poky - Poky Build Tool and Metadata https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=30a3ac4a2e81cb13c3113e15b38444490450a70f bitbake: bitbake-getvar: use finalizeData tinfoil API to get identical result to "bitbake -e" - poky - Poky Build Tool and Metadata https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=4be9d612252286b4f920adb729d28b28e2372dc4 oeqa/selftest: add a test for bitbake "-e" and "-getvar" difference - poky - Poky Build Tool and Metadata https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=131872001abf6c76bd1ed7e31cc68c88ede8ca2c