<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>15942</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2025-07-25 08:23:06 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>AB-INT PTEST RISCV64: python3-hypothesis ptest failure</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2026-06-11 15:04:15 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>10</classification_id>
          <classification>QA/Testing</classification>
          <product>Package Testing (ptest)</product>
          <component>ptest</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>RISCV</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>AB-INT</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>6.1</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="João Marcos Costa">joaomarcos.costa</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Unassigned">unassigned</assigned_to>
          <cc>mathieu.dubois-briand</cc>
    
    <cc>randy.macleod</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
    
    <cc>tgamblin</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>Don&apos;t know</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>102512</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="João Marcos Costa">joaomarcos.costa</who>
    <bug_when>2025-07-25 08:23:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/56/builds/242/steps/12/logs/stdio

Failed ptests:
{&apos;python3-hypothesis&apos;: [&apos;examples/test_binary_search.py:test_insert_is_sorted&apos;]}

qemuriscv64-ptest stream9-vk-1

There was a recent update to v6.135.29, which could explain this issue:
From OE-Core rev: fa2cdb90fc6e28532b0b368a0aa4c00748e19061

----

START: ptest-runner
2025-07-23T17:15

@given(ls=SortedLists, v=Values)
&gt;   def test_insert_is_sorted(ls, v):
                   ^^^
E   hypothesis.errors.FailedHealthCheck: Data generation is extremely slow: Only produced 6 valid examples in 1.77 seconds (0 invalid ones and 1 exceeded maximum size). Try decreasing size of the data you&apos;re generating (with e.g. max_size or max_leaves parameters).
E          count | fraction |    slowest draws (seconds)
E     ls |    7  |     99%  |   0.006,  0.007,  0.008,  0.018,  1.706
E     v  |    6  |      1%  |   0.002,  0.002,  0.003,  0.003,  0.005
E   See https://hypothesis.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reference/api.html#hypothesis.HealthCheck for more information about this. If you want to disable just this health check, add HealthCheck.too_slow to the suppress_health_check settings for this test.

examples/test_binary_search.py:100: FailedHealthCheck
FAIL: examples/test_binary_search.py:test_insert_is_sorted
PASS: examples/test_binary_search.py:test_is_minimal
PASS: examples/test_binary_search.py:test_inserts_into_same_place_twice
PASS: examples/test_rle.py:test_decodes_to_starting_sequence
PASS: examples/test_rle.py:test_duplicating_an_element_does_not_increase_length
============================================================================
Testsuite summary
# TOTAL: 5
# PASS: 4
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

ERROR: Exit status is 1
DURATION: 64</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>102532</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2025-07-31 14:37:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Looks like it is slow so we may want to tweak the timeout?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104500</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2026-03-04 23:06:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Only seen once in July 2025 - resolve?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>104511</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Trevor Gamblin">tgamblin</who>
    <bug_when>2026-03-05 13:42:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I am conflicted. On one hand, if it hasn&apos;t been seen for months it&apos;s probably OK to close, but it&apos;s starting to look like this is an underlying performance issue somewhere in the kernel/QEMU/toolchain optimization triangle, so I doubt it&apos;s actually gone away unless something drastic has changed in the upstream package.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>105602</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2026-05-28 13:16:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bulk move of 6.0 Medium bugs to 6.1.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>105837</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2026-06-11 15:04:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Single event. Not seen in &gt; 6 months.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>