15978 2025-09-25 08:02:38 +0000 AB-INT: perf implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel*' 2025-10-16 15:18:37 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core kernel 5.99 x86 Multiple RESOLVED DUPLICATE 15990 AB-INT High normal 5.3 M3 1 mathieu.dubois-briand ross.burton raj.khem randy.macleod --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 102808 0 mathieu.dubois-briand 2025-09-25 08:02:38 +0000 A new build issue, only seen once so far. | evlist.c: In function 'perf_evlist__purge': | evlist.c:159:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel__delete'; did you mean 'perf_evlist__delete'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | 159 | perf_evsel__delete(pos); | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | perf_evlist__delete | evlist.c:159:17: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_evsel__delete' [-Werror=nested-externs] | evlist.c: In function 'perf_evlist__open': | evlist.c:218:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel__open'; did you mean 'perf_evsel__init'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | 218 | err = perf_evsel__open(evsel, evsel->cpus, evsel->threads); | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | perf_evsel__init | evlist.c:218:23: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_evsel__open' [-Werror=nested-externs] | evlist.c: In function 'perf_evlist__close': | evlist.c:235:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel__close'; did you mean 'perf_evsel__close_fd'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | 235 | perf_evsel__close(evsel); | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | perf_evsel__close_fd | evlist.c:235:17: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_evsel__close' [-Werror=nested-externs] | evlist.c: In function 'perf_evlist__enable': | evlist.c:243:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel__enable'; did you mean 'perf_evlist__enable'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | 243 | perf_evsel__enable(evsel); | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | perf_evlist__enable | evlist.c:243:17: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_evsel__enable' [-Werror=nested-externs] | evlist.c: In function 'perf_evlist__disable': | evlist.c:251:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_evsel__disable'; did you mean 'perf_evlist__disable'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | 251 | perf_evsel__disable(evsel); | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | perf_evlist__disable | evlist.c:251:17: error: nested extern declaration of 'perf_evsel__disable' [-Werror=nested-externs] 102809 1 mathieu.dubois-briand 2025-09-25 08:03:15 +0000 beaglebone rocky8-vk-1 mathieu/master-next completed at 2025-09-24 20:24:29+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/2/builds/2459/steps/12/logs/stdio 102817 2 bruce.ashfield 2025-09-25 12:54:06 +0000 Ross mentioned something about this in IRC as well, but with clang configured (but not used for the build) Is this using a similar configuration ? 102818 3 mathieu.dubois-briand 2025-09-25 13:13:49 +0000 It was on my branch, with the last clang patches from Ross. So yes, maybe this related. We can discuss this with Ross in the bug triage meeting, later today. Commit log of my branch: https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-ci-archive/log/?h=autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/a-full-2437 102820 4 randy.macleod 2025-09-25 14:41:55 +0000 Apparently due to some patches that Ross submitted but can't reproduce. 102862 5 mathieu.dubois-briand 2025-10-02 11:54:34 +0000 Another failure, but I believe there is no point of opening a separate ticket so far. | core.c:36:9: error: 'page_size' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'getpagesize'? genericarm64-alt debian12-vk-7 mathieu/master-next completed at 2025-10-01 08:17:22+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/22/builds/2509/steps/12/logs/stdio genericx86 opensuse155-vk-1 mathieu/master-next completed at 2025-10-02 10:16:54+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/19/builds/2492/steps/13/logs/stdio 102891 6 raj.khem 2025-10-08 01:36:13 +0000 This might be addressed with https://lore.kernel.org/openembedded-core/20251008002729.1850430-1-raj.khem@gmail.com/T/#u 102972 7 randy.macleod 2025-10-16 15:18:37 +0000 Will this cause the bug to recur? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15990 ***