<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>1615</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-10-04 13:33:18 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>gtk+ sato filechooser patch</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-01-26 12:39:54 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>Meta-yocto</product>
          <component>meta-yocto</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>DUPLICATE</resolution>
          <dup_id>110</dup_id>
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>(P3)</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Low</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.3</target_milestone>
          <dependson>110</dependson>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Song Liu">song.liu</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</assigned_to>
          <cc>jessica.zhang</cc>
    
    <cc>josh</cc>
    
    <cc>liezhi.yang</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.bs.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
    
    <cc>Xiaofeng.yan</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>---</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16683</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Song Liu">song.liu</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-04 13:33:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext></thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>16896</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Lock - Disabled">josh</who>
    <bug_when>2011-10-18 10:22:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think this bug is the same as bug 110 ?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17087</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Xiaofeng Yan">Xiaofeng.yan</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-03 22:37:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hi Joshua Lock,

I don&apos;t understand your requirement. File Chooser has been included in gtk+ and I write a test program with File Chooser on qemuarm. It can work rightly. What you think is that we should put some patches to File Chooser but how to get these patches. Can you give me more detailed description. 

Thanks
Yan</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17114</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Lock - Disabled">josh</who>
    <bug_when>2011-11-04 11:08:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Discussion happening in bug 110 to keep it in the same place, this should probably be closed as a duplicate of that bug and you can accept bug 110?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17943</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Robert Yang">liezhi.yang</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-03 19:07:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Re-assign it to Richard since other people who is familiar with gtk+ would work on it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>18378</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2012-01-26 12:39:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is a duplicate of #110

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 110 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>