1756 2011-11-07 05:35:32 +0000 connman test depends on procpc, fails with busybox 2011-11-20 18:13:34 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime Meta-yocto meta-yocto unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium normal 1.2 M1 1 richard.purdie jiajun.xu poky.bs.watcher poky.watcher sgw --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 17142 0 richard.purdie 2011-11-07 05:35:32 +0000 The connman sanity test fails if ps is provided by buxybox and procps isn't installed as the -e option isn't present. 17268 1 jiajun.xu 2011-11-20 18:13:34 +0000 Fixed by poky/master commit: c87a539aec000bdf13180f91a1c970ae9bd789c4 commit c87a539aec000bdf13180f91a1c970ae9bd789c4 Author: Jiajun Xu <jiajun.xu@intel.com> Date: Thu Nov 17 14:05:49 2011 +0800 sanitytest: use different option for command ps from busybox and procps Current sanitytest use option -e for ps command, which only works for ps from procps. It fails if ps is provided by busybox. Add check to use different option for command from busybox and procps. [YOCTO #1756] (From OE-Core rev: dd856f5609c13fc740b53016de033a8a9cbe6b51) Signed-off-by: Jiajun Xu <jiajun.xu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>