1988 2012-02-15 23:28:00 +0000 libva is required for libegl1 2012-02-27 15:00:43 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BSPs bsps-configuration 1.1.1 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium normal 1.1.2 1 jiajun.xu tom.zanussi elizabeth.flanagan josh sgw yp.bsp.watcher yp.watcher --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 18622 0 jiajun.xu 2012-02-15 23:28:00 +0000 tree/branch: poky/edison commit: 69a3fba2aabfa37ebf27d9a2f33304d1c58e4436 meta-intel branch: edison commit: 34478f24de65dd8de8a4c8b913a1458d82dac1fa crownbay and fri2 are found build failed with edison branch for 1.1.1 testing on autobuilder. It failed at do_rootfs phase and reported libva is required for libegl1. ####### | Processing task-core-tools-testapps... | Processing task-core-tools-debug... | Processing task-core-apps-x11-games... | Processing task-core-apps-x11-core... | Processing task-base-extended... | Processing rpm... | Processing task-core-x11-base... | error: Failed dependencies: | libva.so.1 is needed by libegl1-1.8-r7.core2 | libva-x11.so.1 is needed by libegl1-1.8-r7.core2 | libva-tpi.so.1 is needed by libegl1-1.8-r7.core2 NOTE: package core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed ERROR: Task 24 (/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/crownbay/build/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb, do_rootfs) failed with exit code '1' ERROR: '/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/crownbay/build/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb' failed ERROR: '/srv/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-slave/crownbay/build/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato-sdk.bb' failed ####### Detailed log could be found on http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org:8010/builders/crownbay/builds/56/steps/shell_21/logs/stdio. 18632 1 tom.zanussi 2012-02-16 13:35:36 +0000 This looks like the wrong version of the emgd binaries were used for this build. For 1.1, Beth normally uses a special version of the emgd driver with the video components removed for the crownbay and fri2 builds. Is the old version of the 1.8 binaries being used here instead? 18655 2 elizabeth.flanagan 2012-02-19 13:33:56 +0000 This is a backwards compatibility issue on the autobuilder. I should have a build out this PM. 18766 3 tom.zanussi 2012-02-27 15:00:43 +0000 As per Beth's comment, this was a misconfiguration on the autobuilder.