<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2164</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-03-23 13:05:56 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[Hob2] The &apos;All recipes&apos; table in the &apos;Recipes&apos; screen should only have 3 columns: &apos;Name&apos;, &apos;Group&apos; and &apos;Included&apos;.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-04-03 13:53:01 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>Hob</product>
          <component>hob</component>
          <version>1.2</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>VERIFIED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Low</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Giulia">giulia</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Dongxiao Xu">dongxiao.xu</assigned_to>
          <cc>belen.barros.pena</cc>
    
    <cc>dongxiao.xu</cc>
    
    <cc>jessica.zhang</cc>
    
    <cc>jiajun.xu</cc>
    
    <cc>josh</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.bs.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.watcher</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>---</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19404</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Giulia">giulia</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-23 13:05:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext></thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19416</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Shane Wang">shane.wang</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-23 15:14:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Description is</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19465</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dongxiao Xu">dongxiao.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-26 03:08:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually I prefer to keep the LICENSE field in the recipe list, which is important for users to select recipes. For example, if users selected some commercial license recipes (e.x., ffmeg), they do need to have the information that the recipe is not for free license.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19474</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Belen Barros Pena">belen.barros.pena</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-26 09:31:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The question we asked ourselves when it came to select the table headings was: will sorting by the heading help developers find what they are looking for? 

Our assumption was that sorting by license will not particularly help developers find a certain recipe or package, at least it won&apos;t be as useful as sorting by name or group. You probably don&apos;t remember the license of the recipe you are looking for, but you might remember the name or which function it&apos;s related to (i.e. the group).

Having said that, as long as there is enough space in the table, I am not opposed to displaying the license information. However, if adding the license column cuts the name or group values in the table, the license column will have to go. It&apos;s a question of establishing priorities when it comes to displaying information within the space we have available. 

Belen</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19491</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Dongxiao Xu">dongxiao.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-27 01:30:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The current layout in recipe selection is enough for displaying the name/license/group/included information.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19501</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Belen Barros Pena">belen.barros.pena</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-27 08:47:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Without cropping the cell values?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19544</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Dongxiao Xu">dongxiao.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-28 03:21:10 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yes, I think so. You can have a check at the recipe selection page.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19546</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Belen Barros Pena">belen.barros.pena</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-28 09:32:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Great, thanks!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19592</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Dongxiao Xu">dongxiao.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-03-29 05:27:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mark it as WONTFIX</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>19816</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Giulia">giulia</who>
    <bug_when>2012-04-03 13:53:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Done</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>