2290 2012-04-13 03:21:57 +0000 [Multilib]: building error in the stage of do_rootfs when building core-image-sato with mutlilibs feature 2012-04-14 21:56:05 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 1.2 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED (1.2) Patch out for review Medium normal 1.2 M4 1 Xiaofeng.yan richard.purdie meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher richard.purdie --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 20277 0 Xiaofeng.yan 2012-04-13 03:21:57 +0000 error information is as follow in the stage of do_rootfs. | Collected errors: | * resolve_conffiles: Existing conffile /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be placed at /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf-opkg. | + '[' '!' -z '' ']' 20278 1 Xiaofeng.yan 2012-04-13 03:34:37 +0000 opkg accessing configuration file "arch.conf" cause this problem. "arch.conf" is created by "opkg-config-base_1.0.bb". but opkg check check-sum for new arch.conf(the old one come from opkg-config-base_1.0.bb). The old one add "arch x86 26" but there no this line in the new one. $diff /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf-opkg --- /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf 2012-04-12 17:34:30.000000000 +0800 +++ /buildarea1/yxf/poky.multi/build/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs/etc/opkg/arch.conf-opkg 2012-04-12 17:40:33.000000000 +0800 @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ arch noarch 11 arch x86_64 16 arch qemux86_64 21 -arch x86 26 I don't know who create the new arch.conf beside the one from "opkg-config-base_1.0.bb". I will inveterate this. If anyone know this, Please share your experience with me. 20363 2 lianhao.lu 2012-04-14 10:37:28 +0000 Xiaofeng, I may need the exact configurations to reproduce this bug. 20382 3 richard.purdie 2012-04-14 18:35:23 +0000 A reproducer for this is: PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk" MACHINE = "qemux86-64" require conf/multilib.conf MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib32" DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "x86" BASE_LIB_tune-x86 = "lib32" IMAGE_INSTALL_append = "lib32-opkg opkg" in local.conf and then bitbake core-image-minimal 20383 4 richard.purdie 2012-04-14 21:30:28 +0000 As a further hint, the problem is this difference: $ bitbake opkg-config-base -e | grep LIB_PACKAGE # ALL_MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCHS=${@all_multilib_tune_values(d, 'PACKAGE_ARCHS')} ALL_MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCHS="all any noarch x86_64 qemux86_64 x86" $ bitbake lib32-opkg-config-base -e | grep LIB_PACKAGE # ALL_MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCHS=${@all_multilib_tune_values(d, 'PACKAGE_ARCHS')} ALL_MULTILIB_PACKAGE_ARCHS="all any noarch x86 qemux86_64" as these need to have the same value. 20385 5 richard.purdie 2012-04-14 21:56:05 +0000 Resolved in master: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=0a4a7578b84059d598aa775cc6362e1ef68ec3b3