2572 2012-06-11 03:55:46 +0000 [multilib] failed dependency for util-linux with multilib build 2012-07-30 19:52:44 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core unspecified x86 Multiple VERIFIED WORKSFORME Medium major 1.3 M2 1 jiajun.xu bogdan.a.marinescu alexandru.c.georgescu hongnax.xu laurentiu.serban meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher ningx.ma richard.purdie yilongx.y.sun --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 21969 0 jiajun.xu 2012-06-11 03:55:46 +0000 tree/branch: poky/master commit: df8f55a919b3cc602ce1f1c51630c7edf6e36b55 With latest master, multilib build against sato images could not pass do_rootfs. It reports following error: ###### DEBUG: Executing shell function do_rootfs ERROR: Function failed: do_rootfs (see /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/lib32-core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.9788 for further information) Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/qemux86_64... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/x86_64... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/all... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/lib32_qemux86_64... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/lib32_x86... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/all... Generating solve db for /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/deploy/rpm/all... Processing lib32-locale-base-en-us... Processing lib32-locale-base-en-gb... Processing lib32-task-core-boot... Processing lib32-task-core-apps-console... Processing lib32-task-core-standalone-sdk-target... Processing lib32-task-core-ssh-dropbear... Processing lib32-task-core-apps-x11-pimlico... Processing lib32-zypper... Processing lib32-task-core-tools-profile... Processing lib32-task-core-qt-demos... Processing lib32-task-core-x11-sato... Processing lib32-task-core-sdk... Processing lib32-task-core-tools-testapps... Processing lib32-task-core-tools-debug... Processing lib32-task-core-apps-x11-games... Processing lib32-task-core-apps-x11-core... Processing lib32-task-base-extended... Processing lib32-rpm... Processing lib32-task-core-x11-base... Manifest: /home/jxu49/osel/m1-full/lib32-sato-sdk-qemux86-64/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/lib32-core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0/rootfs/install/install.manifest error: Failed dependencies: util-linux-swaponoff is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 util-linux-umount is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 util-linux-losetup is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 ###### 22669 1 richard.purdie 2012-06-28 14:20:17 +0000 I think we might be abel to fix this with something like: --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ python package_depchains() { # Since bitbake can't determine which variables are accessed during package # iteration, we need to list them here: -PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME" +PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME ALTER def gen_packagevar(d): ret = [] 22670 2 richard.purdie 2012-06-28 14:25:14 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > I think we might be abel to fix this with something like: > > --- a/meta/classes/package.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/package.bbclass > @@ -1701,7 +1701,7 @@ python package_depchains() { > > # Since bitbake can't determine which variables are accessed during package > # iteration, we need to list them here: > -PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS > RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME > INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME" > +PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS > RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME > INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME ALTER > > def gen_packagevar(d): > ret = [] My terminal width truncated this. The change should be: -PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME" +PACKAGEVARS = "FILES RDEPENDS RRECOMMENDS SUMMARY DESCRIPTION RSUGGESTS RPROVIDES RCONFLICTS PKG ALLOW_EMPTY pkg_postinst pkg_postrm INITSCRIPT_NAME INITSCRIPT_PARAMS DEBIAN_NOAUTONAME ALTERNATIVE" It should be easy to add this to the file manually, its just adding ALTERNATIVE to PACKAGEVARS. 22672 3 bogdan.a.marinescu 2012-06-28 14:41:00 +0000 I'm pasting below my conversation with Mark Hattle on the subject: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marinescu, Bogdan A <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> Date: Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:16 PM Subject: Re: About your commit on update-alternatives.bbclass To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> Hi, On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> wrote: > On 6/22/12 8:31 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A wrote: >> >> Hello again, >> >> Looking at the log.do_package file (attached) I can see these lines: >> >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /bin/dmesg -> /bin/dmesg.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /bin/kill -> /bin/kill.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /bin/more -> /bin/more.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /bin/reset -> /bin/reset.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /sbin/mkswap -> /sbin/mkswap.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /sbin/blockdev -> /sbin/blockdev.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /sbin/pivot_root -> /sbin/pivot_root.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /sbin/mkfs.minix -> /sbin/mkfs.minix.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/hexdump -> /usr/bin/hexdump.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/last -> /usr/bin/last.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/logger -> /usr/bin/logger.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/mesg -> /usr/bin/mesg.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/renice -> /usr/bin/renice.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/wall -> /usr/bin/wall.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/setsid -> /usr/bin/setsid.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/chrt -> /usr/bin/chrt.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /usr/bin/flock -> /usr/bin/flock.util-linux >> NOTE: util-linux: Rename /sbin/hwclock -> /sbin/hwclock.util-linux > > > The rename happens in the split directory. If it can't find the file in the > split, then the rename and related does not occur... > > >> I'm guessing these come from the update-alternatives.class. I can't >> see any entries for swapon, swapoff and losetup (the missing >> dependencies) although they have ALTERNATE entries in utli-linux.inc: >> >> ALTERNATIVE_util-linux-losetup = "losetup" >> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[losetup] = "${base_sbindir}/losetup" >> >> ALTERNATIVE_util-linux-swaponoff = "swapoff swapon" >> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[swapoff] = "${base_sbindir}/swapoff" >> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[swapon] = "${base_sbindir}/swapon" >> >> Any idea why this happens? > > > The above has the swapoff/swapon only in the util-linux-swaponoff package, > but if the files are not located there then something is going wrong with > the split/do_install/packaging steps. > > Check the order of the PACKAGES variables (use bitbake -e lib32-util-linux), > the items are precessed in that order.. for each item in PACKAGES, check > for FILES_<package>,,, my guess is something generic is matching > swapoff/swapon, before it gets to the util-linux-swaponoff... > PACKAGES="lib32-util-linux-agetty lib32-util-linux-fdisk lib32-util-linux-cfdisk lib32-util-linux-sfdisk lib32-util-linux-swaponoff lib32-util-linux-losetup lib32-util-linux-umount lib32-util-linux-mount lib32-util-linux-readprofile lib32-util-linux-libblkid lib32-util-linux-libblkid-dev lib32-util-linux-libuuid lib32-util-linux-libuuid-dev lib32-util-linux-uuidgen lib32-util-linux-lscpu lib32-util-linux-fsck lib32-util-linux-blkid lib32-util-linux-chkdupexe lib32-util-linux-mkfs lib32-util-linux-mcookie lib32-util-linux-dbg lib32-util-linux-staticdev lib32-util-linux lib32-util-linux-doc lib32-util-linux-dev lib32-util-linux-locale" ./meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc:45:FILES_util-linux-agetty = "${base_sbindir}/agetty" ./meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc:46:FILES_util-linux-fdisk = "${base_sbindir}/fdisk.${BPN}" ./meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc:47:FILES_util-linux-cfdisk = "${base_sbindir}/cfdisk" ./meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc:48:FILES_util-linux-sfdisk = "${sbindir}/sfdisk" After that comes swaponoff and losetup (the missing dependencies). So they don't seem to be matched by something else. Thanks, Bogdan > --Mark > > >> Thank you, >> Bogdan Marinescu >> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help. I added my comments below. >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 6/20/12 9:25 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> I'm working on this bug: >>>>> >>>>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2572 >>>>> >>>>> I talked to Richard about it and he suggested that it might have >>>>> something to do with your changes related to >>>>> update-alternatives.bbclass >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=6ac7e9b5981872b22dcd07f0f7171e1f7c10e284 >>>>> >>>>> (since there is no util-linux-* package generated at all in a multilib >>>>> configuration when building lib32-core-image-sato-sdk). >>>>> >>>>> My experience with multilib is still quite limited and I was wondering >>>>> if you can help with this issue. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bogdan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Looking at the error: >>>> >>>> error: Failed dependencies: >>>> util-linux-swaponoff is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 >>>> util-linux-umount is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 >>>> util-linux-losetup is needed by util-linux-2.21.1-r1.lib32_x86 >>> >>> >>> The error looks a bit different now (after a 'git pull' on poky >>> yesterday (21.06.2012)): >>> >>> | Collected errors: >>> | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following >>> dependencies for lib32-task-core-sdk: >>> | * lib32-util-linux-losetup * lib32-util-linux-umount * >>> lib32-util-linux-swaponoff * >>> | * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package lib32-task-core-sdk. >>> NOTE: package lib32-core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0: task do_rootfs: Failed >>> >>> The missing dependency error is now reported on task-core-sdk instead >>> of util-linux. >>> >>>> >>>> and then looking at the package in oe-core.. The util-linux-* packages >>>> should have been generated when the util-linux recipe was built. If the >>>> util-linux recipe was not built in the lib32 case, then that could be >>>> the >>>> problem -- however at least the base package was built based on the >>>> error >>>> message indicating the base (util-linux) package required the >>>> util-linux-* >>>> packages. >>> >>> >>> Yes, I can see the following directory in my work/: >>> >>> tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-util-linux-2.21.1-r1 >>> >>>> >>>> For debugging, I'd suggest start looking at the the generated >>>> util-linux.spec file in the tmp/work/arch/util-linux-... directory. >>> >>> >>> I can't find any spec file in my util-linux directory unfortunately. >>> >>>> Check >>>> if there is an entry for util-linux-swapoff. Assuming there is, then >>>> most >>>> likely the files section was empty -- so scroll toward the bottom and >>>> check >>>> for %files -n util-linux-swapoff (or similar). Is it empty? >>>> >>>> If the entry is missing (or it's there and empty) then the issue is >>>> nothing >>>> was copied in the do_install/do_package step(s). >>>> >>>> Check out package-split/util-linux-swapoff/* and see if there is >>>> anything >>>> in there... if not then check packages/sbin/ for the swapoff binary.... >>>> If >>>> it's there, but not in the split.. then it got shuffled into the wrong >>>> location -- check the do_package log and see if there are any errors >>>> related >>>> to either hte swapoff binary or util-linux-swapoff. >>> >>> >>> This might be the case, as the >>> >>> tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-util-linux-2.21.1-r1/packages-split/lib32-util-linux-swaponoff >>> is empty, but I can see both "swapon" and "swapoff" in >>> tmp/work/x86-pokymllib32-linux/lib32-util-linux-2.21.1-r1/package/sbin/. >>> I will continue to investigate in this direction. >>> Again, thank you very much for your help. >>> >>> Best, >>> Bogdan >>> >>>> >>>> --Mark > > > 22863 4 ningx.ma 2012-07-06 07:38:45 +0000 There is no such issue in 1.2.1 testing. Tree/Branch: Poky/denzil Poky Commit id: 73cdebf60df225ee10f2eb215935be3b61e1b831 23437 5 bogdan.a.marinescu 2012-07-24 12:52:45 +0000 Unable to reproduce on the poky master with commit 0ffb02eec2beaea27ff0ec9d3d31b0a09e675a4c 23612 6 laurentiu.serban 2012-07-30 19:52:44 +0000 Verified this in fb53d69d9c726e6a663ea276cc440676e20f8326