2607 2012-06-14 15:05:19 +0000 cannot compile iptables-1.4.11.tar.bz2 2012-07-11 11:36:50 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BSPs bsps-configuration 1.3 x86 Multiple VERIFIED NOTABUG Medium normal 1.3 M2 1 alexandru.c.georgescu sgw jiajun.xu laurentiu.serban sgw yp.bsp.watcher yp.watcher --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 22187 0 alexandru.c.georgescu 2012-06-14 15:05:19 +0000 iptables-1.4.11.tar.bz2 fails to compile on the following image: core-image-sato-sdk-sugarbay-20120613171206.hddimg The output here: root@sugarbay:~/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11# make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/root/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11' Making all in extensions make[2]: Entering directory `/home/root/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11/extensions' CC libxt_pkttype.oo In file included from libxt_pkttype.c:10:0: /usr/include/linux/if_packet.h:176:2: error: unknown type name '__aligned_u64' make[2]: *** [libxt_pkttype.oo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/root/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11/extensions' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/root/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11' make: *** [all] Error 2 root@sugarbay:~/iptables2/iptables-1.4.11# Iptables tarball downloaded from: http://netfilter.org/projects/iptables/files/iptables-1.4.11.tar.bz2 22189 1 bruce.ashfield 2012-06-14 15:09:11 +0000 why isn't this using 1.4.13 ? this bug is fixed there, if you use another version, you'd need to port the 1.4.13 fix. 22257 2 jiajun.xu 2012-06-17 14:10:20 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > why isn't this using 1.4.13 ? this bug is fixed there, if you use another > version, you'd need to port the 1.4.13 fix. Yes, we should use 1.4.13. Sorry, Alex, we used to find the issue and update the test cases for ADT, but not for the compiling testing for real target. I will update the test plan. 22477 3 sgw 2012-06-21 16:45:04 +0000 Is this a bug that we need to worry about or was this just a bad test case? 22486 4 jiajun.xu 2012-06-22 08:28:29 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > Is this a bug that we need to worry about or was this just a bad test case? Mark the bug as NOTABUG. We should update the test case to use 1.4.13. 22994 5 laurentiu.serban 2012-07-11 11:36:50 +0000 verified