<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2712</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-07-06 16:23:28 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>All BSP README files for the meta-intel BSPs should note the 10-day timer feature for unaltered images</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-04-28 07:45:08 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>5</classification_id>
          <classification>Infrastructure</classification>
          <product>AutoBuilder</product>
          <component>autobuilder</component>
          <version>1.3</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</assigned_to>
          <cc>elizabeth.flanagan</cc>
    
    <cc>infras.ab.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>Infras.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
    
    <cc>song.liu</cc>
    
    <cc>tom.zanussi</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>---</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22874</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-06 16:23:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>BSPs that reside in the meta-intel layer have a 10-day timer function that is enabled by default.  This means if a user downloads the image and boots it on target hardware without a rebuild the target hardware will run for 10 days and then automatically reboot.  Each README file for these BSPs should have this documented.

ScottR</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22875</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Tom Zanussi">tom.zanussi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-06 16:35:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This only applies to the images built by the autobuilder.  As such, the autobuilder build infrastructure should add a README or append the existing one with a note to that affect.  It doesn&apos;t normally belong in the README.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22876</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-06 16:39:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From an end-user&apos;s point of view though wouldn&apos;t I want to see this as part of the README for the BSP I am about ready to download? I don&apos;t know the specifics of how it would be implemented but it seems like the user should be alerted to this as close as possible to the actual BSP.

ScottR</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22877</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Tom Zanussi">tom.zanussi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-06 16:47:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yeah, that&apos;s what I&apos;m saying - the tarball should contain the info if it contains images generated by the autobuilder, but if the tarball doesn&apos;t contain images or if the user just checks out from the repo, it shouldn&apos;t contain that info.  It&apos;s conditional on the what the autobuilder generates, and the autobuilder knows what it&apos;s generating, so should contain the logic for conditionally including it or not.

What appears on the website is orthogonal to this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22878</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-06 16:55:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tom, 

I understand now.  So the bug is really a little bit different then.  It should be against the autobuilder and it should somehow create or insert a warning into the README if needed.  Who knows how this can be filed.  I don&apos;t.  What is the right course of action here?  Somehow cancel or kill this bug since i have filed it against the BSPs, which is likely not the way to do it.  Should a new bug be opened?

ScottR

BTW - I can handle the webpage notes for the affected BSPs, which are indeed orthogonal.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26645</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-16 14:45:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m going to do this manually for the meta-intel release, and put this into the AB during the 1.4 timeframe.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>32701</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2013-04-28 07:45:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed in: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-autobuilder/commit/?h=eflanagan/yocto-autobuilder-refactor&amp;id=503083756a36edd4bf967349ea838c37bbe71bfd</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>