<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2732</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-07-10 17:00:00 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Better build failure email.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2012-10-09 13:04:46 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>5</classification_id>
          <classification>Infrastructure</classification>
          <product>AutoBuilder</product>
          <component>autobuilder</component>
          <version>1.3</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>VERIFIED</bug_status>
          <resolution>OBSOLETE</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.3 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</assigned_to>
          <cc>alexandru.c.georgescu</cc>
    
    <cc>alexandrux.palalau</cc>
    
    <cc>corneliux.stoicescu</cc>
    
    <cc>elizabeth.flanagan</cc>
    
    <cc>infras.ab.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>Infras.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
    
    <cc>song.liu</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>---</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22963</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-10 17:00:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The build failure email is good but needs better failure emails. Todo:

grep for &quot;| ERROR:&quot; and &quot;| WARN:&quot;
if the buildstep is a copy, ignore.
send out the first 20 lines not the last 20
send out the consolidated error from bitbake (end of build)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24511</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-08-27 21:21:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed in commit 77d297b489b315bbb3e358c3a4be02b778f72d5e in the autobuilder production repo.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26199</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Palalau">alexandrux.palalau</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-04 10:02:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>At this moment I do not see all of the mentioned changes within the autobuilder email messages.
-&gt; The last 20 lines are sent (not the first 20)
-&gt; Not all the ERROR and WARN lines are presented

Consolidated error is present but this happens due to the fact that it is written last (it gets included within the 20 last lines).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26253</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-04 17:06:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m marking this as Resolved:

We currently have this implemented in the production autobuilder although the initial specifications are different than what I implemented. It does what is needed without spamming the list with lots of bad emails.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26320</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Stoicescu Cornel">corneliux.stoicescu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 09:06:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hello

How can I verify this? Or should we put it on Obsolete as the initial specifications are no longer valid?

Thank you</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26353</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Beth Flanagan">elizabeth.flanagan</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 16:27:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The original specs are no longer valid. This should be listed as resolved. &quot;better&quot; is kind of subjective here.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26423</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Georgescu">alexandru.c.georgescu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-09 13:04:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #5)
&gt; The original specs are no longer valid. This should be listed as resolved.
&gt; &quot;better&quot; is kind of subjective here.

Marking this as Verified as per the last comment.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>