<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>2773</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-07-17 04:30:23 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[multilib] no provider for lib64-perf/lsb-image</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-01-29 16:20:41 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>OE-Core</product>
          <component>core</component>
          <version>1.3</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WORKSFORME</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.4 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Hongna Xu">hongnax.xu</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Tom Zanussi">tom.zanussi</assigned_to>
          <cc>dvhart</cc>
    
    <cc>jiajun.xu</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.mr.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>ningx.ma</cc>
    
    <cc>song.liu</cc>
    
    <cc>yilongx.y.sun</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>---</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>23144</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Hongna Xu">hongnax.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-17 04:30:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>tree/branch: poky/master
commit: eb0cb7e8234f5d2e5623406e9660be91cf52f65e

With latest master, multilib build against lsb images could not pass. It reports no provider for lib64-perf

the logs are:
********************
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = &quot;1.15.2&quot;
TARGET_ARCH       = &quot;i586&quot;
TARGET_OS         = &quot;linux&quot;
MACHINE           = &quot;qemux86&quot;
DISTRO            = &quot;poky&quot;
DISTRO_VERSION    = &quot;1.2+snapshot-20120717&quot;
TUNE_FEATURES     = &quot;m32 i586&quot;
TARGET_FPU        = &quot;&quot;
meta             
meta-yocto        = &quot;master:eb0cb7e8234f5d2e5623406e9660be91cf52f65e&quot;

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES &apos;lib64-perf&apos; (but virtual:multilib:lib64:/home/build/poky/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools-profile.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target &apos;lib64-perf&apos; is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: [&apos;lib64-perf&apos;]
NOTE: Runtime target &apos;lib64-task-core-tools-profile&apos; is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: [&apos;lib64-task-core-tools-profile&apos;, &apos;lib64-perf&apos;]
ERROR: Required build target &apos;lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk&apos; has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: [&apos;lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk&apos;, &apos;lib64-task-core-tools-profile&apos;, &apos;lib64-perf&apos;]

Summary: There was 1 WARNING message shown.
Summary: There were 2 ERROR messages shown, returning a non-zero exit code.
*************************</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26365</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Darren Hart">dvhart</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 18:16:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tom, should we bump to 1.4?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26369</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Tom Zanussi">tom.zanussi</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 18:51:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yeah, I actually don&apos;t think this is a problem any more, but will have to verify.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26373</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Darren Hart">dvhart</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 19:55:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>OK, marking as NEEDINFO until we know if this is still an open issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>29298</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Tom Zanussi">tom.zanussi</who>
    <bug_when>2013-01-29 16:20:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Not seeing the problem with current master.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>