2892 2012-08-04 02:56:25 +0000 rpm fails to generate root file system when /bin/traceroute6 is included 2012-09-29 02:04:12 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core devtools / tool chain 1.3 x86 Multiple VERIFIED FIXED Medium+ normal 1.3 M4 1 raj.khem sgw corneliux.stoicescu jessica.zhang liang.li2 mark.hatle meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher richard.purdie sgw --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 23802 0 raj.khem 2012-08-04 02:56:25 +0000 I get this error iputils-traceroute6 ################################################## chmod: cannot access `/bin/traceroute6': No such file or directory when building an image. packaging backend is rpm. I havent tried opkg or dpkg But then I also see meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20101006.bb do_install () .... install -m 4555 traceroute6 ${D}${base_bindir}/ I wonder if those permissions are not ok for rpm ? 23980 1 sgw 2012-08-13 18:45:04 +0000 Can you reproduce this? I just tried to build core-image-basic which contains iputils with the RPM Package management and was not able to get the same failure. 24000 2 raj.khem 2012-08-13 22:54:08 +0000 Did you check log.do_rootfs 24021 3 sgw 2012-08-14 11:03:36 +0000 No I had not orignally, now I do see the chown issue, I am working to get better details. 24364 4 sgw 2012-08-22 21:56:40 +0000 I have tracked into the pkg_postinst processing, it occurs with both RPM and IPK which makes me think it might be related to pseudo. The paths in the pkg_postinst functions (in the recipes) are target relative and that's also the paths that are being used for the chmod. Not sure if there should be some processing of the paths when run on the host system or if the packaging systems/pseudo need a chroot someplace. 24377 5 raj.khem 2012-08-23 01:34:08 +0000 I have a patch http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/35187/ 24379 6 seebs 2012-08-23 01:49:08 +0000 $ rpm -pq --scripts iputils-traceroute6-s20101006-r5.i586.rpm warning: iputils-traceroute6-s20101006-r5.i586.rpm: Header V4 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e03cb778 postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): # iputils-traceroute6 - postinst chmod 4555 /bin/traceroute6 ^-- I think this is the problem. So, thinking about this a bit: pkg_postinst_${PN}-traceroute6 () { chmod 4555 ${base_bindir}/traceroute6 } It's pretty obvious that the *intent* of this is to somehow make sure the file gets the right mode. I'm pretty sure we just plain don't need this, though -- if do_install works, RPM will take care of that anyway. Khem's patch looks reasonable to me, but I'm a bit unsure about one thing. These scripts will be expanded at build time, then embedded in RPMs. Will they work if the RPM is then used with another build directory or target? I'm wondering whether just removing these would work... 24380 7 raj.khem 2012-08-23 03:24:12 +0000 (In reply to comment #6) > $ rpm -pq --scripts iputils-traceroute6-s20101006-r5.i586.rpm > warning: iputils-traceroute6-s20101006-r5.i586.rpm: Header V4 DSA signature: > NOKEY, key ID e03cb778 > postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): > # iputils-traceroute6 - postinst > chmod 4555 /bin/traceroute6 > > ^-- I think this is the problem. > > So, thinking about this a bit: > > pkg_postinst_${PN}-traceroute6 () { > chmod 4555 ${base_bindir}/traceroute6 > } > > It's pretty obvious that the *intent* of this is to somehow make sure the > file gets the right mode. I'm pretty sure we just plain don't need this, > though -- if do_install works, RPM will take care of that anyway. > > Khem's patch looks reasonable to me, but I'm a bit unsure about one thing. > These scripts will be expanded at build time, then embedded in RPMs. Will > they work if the RPM is then used with another build directory or target? > > I'm wondering whether just removing these would work... see its $D and not ${D} for a reason :) 24473 8 sgw 2012-08-25 01:14:00 +0000 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=d36ecc389a3d1e2deafd606e734acd16ab0951b3 25904 9 corneliux.stoicescu 2012-09-28 09:36:20 +0000 Verified in: commit: 718eb85806e080d0b165344b272e531ef19421eb Date: Tue Sep 25 17:14:23 2012 -0700 Bitbaked core-image-basic with qemux86; log.do_rootfs shows: " iputils-tracepath ################################################## iputils-tracepath6 ################################################## iputils-traceroute6 ################################################## gawk-common ################################################## ethtool ################################################## " 25951 10 liang.li2 2012-09-29 02:04:12 +0000 run "bitbake core-image-basic" with qemux86 (package type ipk),log.do_rootfs also no such error: ... Installing iputils-traceroute6 (s20101006-r6) to root... Downloading file:/buildarea/tester/build_102/tmp/deploy/ipk/i586/iputils-traceroute6_s20101006-r6_i586.ipk. Installing iputils-tracepath6 (s20101006-r6) to root... Downloading file:/buildarea/tester/build_102/tmp/deploy/ipk/i586/iputils-tracepath6_s20101006-r6_i586.ipk. ... git info :718eb85806e080d0b165344b272e531ef19421eb git branch: poky/master