<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>3169</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2012-09-25 13:38:44 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Implement Shuku proposal</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2017-12-06 16:46:26 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>6</classification_id>
          <classification>Yocto Project Subprojects</classification>
          <product>Sato</product>
          <component>sato</component>
          <version>1.3</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.2 M1</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>35</blocked>
    
    <blocked>2415</blocked>
    
    <blocked>4659</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8606</blocked>
    
    <blocked>9664</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</assigned_to>
          <cc>alex.kanavin</cc>
    
    <cc>alexandru.c.georgescu</cc>
    
    <cc>alexandru.damian</cc>
    
    <cc>david.c.stewart</cc>
    
    <cc>jessica.zhang</cc>
    
    <cc>jose.perez.carranza</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
    
    <cc>song.liu</cc>
    
    <cc>terence.chiang</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>Don&apos;t know</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25692</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-25 13:38:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Shuku proposal was basically turning Sato into a test runner and validation UI instead of a bad PIM.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25848</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Damian">alexandru.damian</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-27 12:50:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Do we have any kind of specs ? 

I assume this is a 1.4 task ?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25849</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2012-09-27 13:05:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>1.4, yes.  No hard specification but my proposal was on oe-core.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27721</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Terence Chiang">terence.chiang</who>
    <bug_when>2012-11-27 11:56:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think integrating “Phoronix Test Suite” in the YP layer is a good approach as the first step. I aslo get some feedback from the board manufactures that what tools are used for platform validation. most of them are tools in DOS. But I don&apos;t know whether there are some similar tools in Linux that could be used. here is the list:
CPU test     : chkcpu.exe (DOS6.22)
com port test: BEAR UART Card (DOS6.22)
LAN port test: novell link test (DOS6.22), Lanconf (DOS), iperf (Linux)
USB port test: bear usb-t02 card (DOS6.22), USBHSET (Windows)
SATA HDD test: copy&amp;compare (DOS6.22)
SATA test    : RU473/ADU461 (DOS)
DRAM test    : read dram size (DOS6.22), Memtest86(Windows/Linux)
PCI-E Test   : bear pci-e card (DOS6.22)
Fan Test     : cmos check (Dos6.22)
buzzer test  : speaker.com (DOS6.22)
Gfx test     : 3DMark (Windows/Linux), OpenArena (Windows/Linux), glxgears, render_bench, VLC
Burn-in for All     : Passmark (Windows) for running 72 hours
Burn-in for Com Port: PCCOM2000 (Windows) for running 72 hours
Burn-in for Storage : Winthrax.exe (Windows)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27722</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2012-11-27 12:01:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not entirely convinced phoronix is the best idea as it has a massive range of dependencies (postgres, apache, ...).  My initial goal isn&apos;t to focus on raw performance but functional testing:

- does the touchscreen work correctly
- 2D acceleration
- GL support
- VAAPI support
- sound input/output through each output

And so on.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>31629</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Dave Stewart">david.c.stewart</who>
    <bug_when>2013-04-05 23:10:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Promoting this to HIGH for 1.5</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>33405</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2013-05-30 15:06:02 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ross is clearly doing this ;-)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>34282</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2013-07-02 15:05:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In progress but not ready for merging.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>50730</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Georgescu">alexandru.c.georgescu</who>
    <bug_when>2015-05-04 11:09:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #7)
&gt; In progress but not ready for merging.

Hi Ross,
Any updates on this?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>55103</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-09 10:37:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>To make this bug clear as all the discussion happened on the mailing lists - the Shuku proposal is to take Sato, port to GTK+3 (this is mostly done, needs bug fixing), and drop the pretence that it&apos;s a reference UI for a PDA, swapping stuff like &quot;Music Player&quot; for &quot;GStreamer test harness&quot; (this in particular has happened).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>55360</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-15 15:11:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 8470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>55516</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-20 14:27:09 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reassigning to Alex as he expressed interest in actually doing this for 2.1.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58813</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-10 09:01:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Not sure if it&apos;s too late for 2.1 but I finally have something to show so I&apos;m moving to M3 and sending some patches ...</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59966</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-15 08:57:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;ve sent a RFC patchset to list: IMO it&apos;s too late for 2.1 release, I propose moving to 2.2 M1.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61901</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-03 16:11:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Status update:

* All of the &quot;upstream&quot; patchsets have been sent (mostly to yocto ML)
* There&apos;s a WIP poky branch that contains these to-be-upstreamed patches
  and everything else I intend to send:
  http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=jku/matchbox-wip

Possible issues:
* Some recipes still depend on GTK+2 (see list below). These are
  all development tools though: nothing that should be used on actual
  target images
* GTK+3 still currently requires opengl (via libepoxy)
* I&apos;ve had to replace some software: e.g. adding l3afpad to oe-core
  (as a replacement for leafpad) might still require discussion


List of GTK+2 reverse dependencies in oe-core world build after my patches:
* gnome-themes-standard
  - Gtk+2 theme that matches the current Gtk+3 theme
* alsa-tools
  - some tools depend on Gtk+2
sysprof
  - latest version requires gtk3 &amp; polkit, but can compile without GUI
latencytop			
kernelshark
fstests
oprofileui			
libglade
  - used by by oprofileui and (current) sysprof</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61924</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 11:24:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>It would be good to tag new versions, and make the recipes refer to those versions, instead of just updating the commit ids, e.g. here:

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=jku/matchbox-wip&amp;id=9315cad3da18127925ac0c10e2f208bd2b61c40b

So that the recipe reporting system can correctly report those recipes as &apos;up to date&apos; instead of &apos;unknown&apos;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63148</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-20 12:47:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Not sure how close we got to the original &quot;Shuku proposal&quot; (from Yocto 1.3 !) but I&apos;m calling it done: matchbox components (and the rest of oe-core) now use Gtk+3. 

Tweaks and improvements to the UI should be filed as new bugs.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>