3666 2012-12-31 04:36:41 +0000 Missing procps package in sato and sato-sdk image 2013-01-08 00:11:34 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 1.4 x86 Multiple RESOLVED NOTABUG Medium normal 1.4 1 yi.zhao sgw hongxu.jia liang.li2 meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher Qi.Chen --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 28500 0 yi.zhao 2012-12-31 04:36:41 +0000 Image location: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20121226-1/ Tree/Branch: poky/master Git commit: 4a36a32567ecfbc7ce7b967803e6e23314953ef5 The procps package which includes ps command is missing in sato and sato-sdk image. Currently the /bin/ps command is linked to busybox. ########### root@qemuarm:~# ls -l /bin/ps lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Dec 26 20:35 /bin/ps -> busybox root@qemuarm:~# root@qemuarm:~# rpm -qf /bin/ps busybox-1.20.2-r4.armv5te root@qemuarm:~# ############ With 20121205 build (git commit: 381c4b69c7e8b452f4d3de2f8214e6e5f6a9abe7), This package is installed. ########### root@qemuarm:~# ls -l /bin/ps lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Dec 5 18:05 /bin/ps -> ps.procps root@qemuarm:~# rpm -qf /bin/ps.procps procps-3.2.8-r10.armv5te root@qemuarm:~# ########### I don't know if it is a real issue or we just do it on purpose. 28600 1 sgw 2013-01-08 00:11:34 +0000 I think this is due to the fact that zypper RRECOMMEDS procps and the newer smart packaging does not, so procps does not get installed. This is intended. If you built ipk vs rpm you might see the same difference.