3769 2013-01-22 09:22:52 +0000 smart: some packages can not be reinstalled 2013-02-22 13:23:48 +0000 1 1 11 Runtime Package Management Issues package-management-issues 1.4 x86 Multiple VERIFIED NOTABUG Medium normal 1.4 1 yi.zhao bogdan.a.marinescu bluelightning bogdan.a.marinescu corneliux.stoicescu hongxu.jia liang.li2 mark.hatle Qi.Chen --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 29022 0 yi.zhao 2013-01-22 09:22:52 +0000 Image location: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130115-2/ Tree/Branch: poky/master Git Rev: 9eb88ceb39b7d0b8ddc6487e61ce8edadef10ec4 I found if some packages are pre-installed in rootfs, then run smart reinstall command can not reinstall them. For example: The package less is already installed in sato-sdk rootfs: ########## root@beagleboard:~# smart channel --show [rpmsys] type = rpm-sys root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# smart query less --show-channels Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon [rpmsys] Saving cache... ############ Then add a remote repo and reinstall it, would get the following message: ########### root@beagleboard:~# smart channel --add myrpmmd type=rpm-md baseurl=http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/rpm Alias: myrpmmd Type: rpm-md Base URL: http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/rpm Include this channel? (y/N): y root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# smart update Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] Fetching information for 'myrpmmd'... -> http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/rpm/repodata/repomd.xml repomd.xml ######################################## [ 50%] -> http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/rpm/repodata/primary.xml.gz -> http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/rpm/repodata/filelists.xml.gz filelists.xml.gz ######################################## [ 75%] primary.xml.gz ######################################## [100%] Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] Channels have 6324 new packages. Saving cache... root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# smart query less --show-channels Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon [myrpmmd] less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon [rpmsys] root@beagleboard:~# smart reinstall less Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] error: 'less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon' is not available for reinstallation root@beagleboard:~# ############## But if I remove it by smart remove and install it again. Then the reinstall command could work. ############## root@beagleboard:~# smart remove less Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] Computing transaction... Removing packages (3): less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon packagegroup-core-sdk-1.0-r9@all less-dev-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon 134.6kB will be freed. Confirm changes? (Y/n): y Committing transaction... Preparing... ######################################## [ 0%] 1:Removing less-dev ######################################## [ 33%] 2:Removing packagegroup-co.. ######################################## [ 66%] 3:Removing less ######################################## [100%] update-alternatives: Linking //usr/bin/less to /bin/busybox root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# root@beagleboard:~# smart install less Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] Computing transaction... Installing packages (1): less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon 71.0kB of package files are needed. 134.6kB will be used. Confirm changes? (Y/n): y Fetching packages... -> http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/.../less-457-r0.armv7a_vfp_neon.rpm less-457-r0.armv7a_vfp_neon.rpm ######################################## [100%] Committing transaction... Preparing... ######################################## [ 0%] 1:Installing less ######################################## [100%] Output from less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon: update-alternatives: Linking //usr/bin/less to /usr/bin/less.less Saving cache... root@beagleboard:~# smart reinstall less Loading cache... Updating cache... ######################################## [100%] Computing transaction... Installing packages (1): less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon 71.0kB of package files are needed. 134.6kB will be used. Confirm changes? (Y/n): y Fetching packages... -> http://140.211.169.59/nightly/20130115-2/.../less-457-r0.armv7a_vfp_neon.rpm less-457-r0.armv7a_vfp_neon.rpm ######################################## [100%] Committing transaction... Preparing... ######################################## [ 0%] 1:Installing less ######################################## [100%] Output from less-457-r0@armv7a_vfp_neon: update-alternatives: Linking //usr/bin/less to /usr/bin/less.less root@beagleboard:~# ########### 29297 1 bogdan.a.marinescu 2013-01-29 15:01:18 +0000 This is indeed a bit weird, but it seems to be the correct behaviour as far as smart is concerned. The error comes from here (commands/reinstall.py): found = False for pkg in pkgs: if pkg.installed: found = True trans.enqueue(pkg, REINSTALL) for loader in pkg.loaders: if not loader.getInstalled(): break else: raise Error, _("'%s' is not available for " "reinstallation") % pkg smart will consider a package for reinstallation if it has at least one loader that reports it as not being installed. This behaviour is consistent with other parts of the smart code; for exampe, the code below can be found in control.py in a number of places: loaders = [x for x in pkg.loaders if not x.getInstalled()] Again, only the loaders that report the package as "not installed" are considered by smart. This behaviour might have something to do with this (check section "Smart transactions"): http://zorked.net/smart/doc/README.html (in particular this phrase: "Packages may even be reinstalled, IF different packages with the same name-version pair have different relations, and the one not installed is a considered better option.") What I can gather from this is that smart works a bit differently than other package managers when it comes to reinstalling a package, but that's not necessarily an error, so I'm closing this bug. If you don't agree with this, please reopen it and add your comments. 30038 2 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-02-22 13:23:48 +0000 Verified as per above comment.