4011 2013-03-11 21:12:31 +0000 Merge machine specific config recipes into one recipe to rule them all 2026-05-21 15:29:06 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 5.99 x86 Multiple NEW http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6362 Low enhancement Future 1 richard.purdie unassigned akuster alexandru.c.georgescu dvhart jose.perez.carranza mark.hatle meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher randy.macleod ross.burton srifenbark --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 30630 0 richard.purdie 2013-03-11 21:12:31 +0000 We currently have a lot of individual recipes installing single machine specific files. We need to combine these to be installed by a single recipe which still creates all the relavent individual recipes. 43525 1 sgw 2014-05-22 19:43:36 +0000 Here is the list of recipes that contain config files for qemu currently meta/recipes-bsp/pointercal meta/recipes-bsp/formfactor meta/recipes-core/init-ifupdown/init-ifupdown-1.0 meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman-conf meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-xserver/xserver-xf86-config Darren's bug 6362 also points out alsa-state is another one. Some others that might fall into this category are: tslib.conf (still used by directfb and qt4-embedded), maybe we need to bluez's bluetooth.com apmd_proxy.conf Anything I missed? 43526 2 richard.purdie 2014-05-22 19:47:25 +0000 keymaps, alsa-state, pointercal, pointercal-xinput, come to mind 43577 3 sgw 2014-05-23 22:33:15 +0000 My proposal is to move all the BSP related config files into one recipe directory tree. Create a recipe that can have a package or packages that are RRECOMMENDS on. We have 2 choices on the packaging side: 1) 1 Package to rule them all (conffiles) - RPROVIDES PN-conf - conffile.bbclass RRECOMMENDS = "${PN}-conf" # Can be overriden in recipe CONFFILES_conffiles ?= "${PN}.conf" - Will provide files not needed on final image, small amount of extra space used. 2) 1 package / conf file (${PN}-conf) - exactly what's needed will be installed - no needs for additional RPROVIDES - More packaging overhead, package data might be bigger than actual contents! 51400 4 srifenbark 2015-06-01 21:22:07 +0000 I am unsure how either of the solutions in Comment 3 exactly would affect the user documentation. Solution 1 looks like a new class would be added (i.e. conffile.bbclass). Would there be a shift in how the user goes about providing configuration files? This is what I am missing. When a solution for this bug is figured out I will need more explanation for the doc updates. Thanks, Scott NOTE: Here are a couple spots of interest that might be affected? Not sure but I am noting them here: * The "Configuration Files" item in the http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.9/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#yocto-project-terms section. * The Note in Step 4 of the http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.9/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#developing-a-board-support-package-bsp section. 85941 5 akuster 2019-12-22 21:22:49 +0000 is this still an issue? 86433 6 richard.purdie 2020-02-13 16:18:53 +0000 Is still a valid issue.