4528 2013-05-22 13:03:04 +0000 boot time should be tracked for systemd and SysVinit 2017-12-06 16:47:30 +0000 1 1 10 QA/Testing Test Plans/Suite test-plans/suite 1.5 x86 Multiple RESOLVED OBSOLETE Medium+ enhancement 2.3 M2 1 corneliux.stoicescu humberto.ibarra.lopez anibal.limon bluelightning bogdanx.a.voiculescu corneliux.stoicescu francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez humberto.ibarra.lopez leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez net147 richard.purdie sgw sonia.delgado todor.minchev --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 33202 0 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-05-22 13:03:04 +0000 Boot time should be tracked as a performance metric for both the init systems used in Yocto: systemd and sysvinit. Results should be stored similar to https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Performance_Test 33203 1 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-05-22 13:13:37 +0000 To test this we need to use real hardware as qemu images would introduce undesired variables. Systemd should allready have a bootchart feature integrated. For sysvinit we could use ./meta-oe/recipes-devtools/bootchart from git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded 35845 2 alexandru.c.georgescu 2013-08-22 07:38:07 +0000 I think this is a good candidate for the runtime test framework (ready only for QEMU), but may be used when we'll have the ability to run it on real HW too. 35846 3 alexandru.c.georgescu 2013-08-22 07:44:55 +0000 This should be targeted for future. 36956 4 alexandru.c.georgescu 2013-09-19 13:41:31 +0000 marking it for future. Depends on image-tests framework on real HW 40736 5 bluelightning 2014-02-27 11:00:48 +0000 I've just filed bug 5893 which may relate to this. 49236 6 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-03-05 19:23:15 +0000 (In reply to comment #5) > I've just filed bug 5893 which may relate to this. I definitely want this in, but it will make it in 1.9. 62202 7 benjamin.esquivel 2016-05-13 22:13:57 +0000 Anibal has some insight to this 64728 8 anibal.limon 2016-08-01 15:15:59 +0000 We already have a test for measure boot time for systemd [1], for this bug i think the implementation should be done in the performance script. [2] [1] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/systemd.py#n132 [2] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/scripts/oe-build-perf-test 67914 9 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez 2016-11-03 15:25:48 +0000 (In reply to comment #8) > We already have a test for measure boot time for systemd [1], for this bug i > think the implementation should be done in the performance script. [2] > > [1] > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/ > systemd.py#n132 > [2] > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/scripts/oe-build-perf- > test Anibal, Based on this we could close this as resolved? Regards. 67915 10 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez 2016-11-03 15:27:43 +0000 Anibal, Based on this we could close this as resolved? Regards. 67916 11 anibal.limon 2016-11-03 15:28:53 +0000 (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > We already have a test for measure boot time for systemd [1], for this bug i > > think the implementation should be done in the performance script. [2] > > > > [1] > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/ > > systemd.py#n132 > > [2] > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/scripts/oe-build-perf- > > test > > Anibal, > Based on this we could close this as resolved? > Regards. I don't think so, this boot time measurement is related to the target, as i know we don't have performance tests for the target and this boot time will be one of them. 67919 12 jose.perez.carranza 2016-11-03 15:53:24 +0000 CC Humberto Ibarra, He is working on performance on runtime. @Francisco please talk to Humberto, this bug may be end up assigned to him. 69055 13 humberto.ibarra.lopez 2016-12-12 21:32:01 +0000 There is a related bug that might be implementing this already, bug is 10500. Sent mail about this and waiting for answers. 69989 14 humberto.ibarra.lopez 2017-01-22 13:03:22 +0000 Runtime performance is being reevaluated in bug #10951, a new version for this will probably come out in the next days attached to that umbrella bug.