4578 2013-05-30 16:52:27 +0000 x32 ABI performance comparison 2020-06-25 08:25:53 +0000 1 1 9 Documentation General Docs docs-general unspecified x86 x86_64 RESOLVED INVALID Medium enhancement Future 1 bluelightning unassigned alexandru.c.georgescu ionut.a.gavaz jose.perez.carranza nitin.a.kamble richard.purdie sgw apoorv.sangal --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 33413 0 bluelightning 2013-05-30 16:52:27 +0000 Given how easy it is to build x32 images now it would be useful to do some performance analysis of the x32 ABI vs x86-64 on the same hardware, and produce a document presenting the results. 33494 1 srifenbark 2013-06-03 11:54:38 +0000 So I guess the ultimate conclusion for this bug is some documentation that shows the performance comparisons. I don't have that data so I am marking this as NEEDINFO. Please let me know when we get some information for it and I will work it into the documentation. Scott 33552 2 sgw 2013-06-04 16:24:56 +0000 Possibly some QA resources could be used to do this? 38375 3 srifenbark 2013-10-31 17:38:18 +0000 Setting target to "Future" 43658 4 richard.purdie 2014-05-29 15:11:31 +0000 Alex: Reassigning this to you to figure out what kind of comparison we could do as part of the other runtime benchmark work and to get the actual data. Once you have some data, Scott will be able to find somewhere we can share it. 81043 5 anuj.mittal 2018-07-09 01:39:10 +0000 *** Bug 2552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 87598 6 richard.purdie 2020-06-25 08:25:53 +0000 We don't publish performance data like this so its not something we plan to do.