5089 2013-08-30 11:32:41 +0000 Missing KERNEL_IMAGE_BASE_NAME in the migration guide 2013-09-03 13:17:18 +0000 1 1 9 Documentation Reference handbook unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-docs/commit/?id=8ff3d263d2374ab3745e5264c3747e36674e7484 3 July 2013: RESOLVED Undecided normal --- 1 lpapp srifenbark bluelightning poky.doc.watcher poky.watcher srifenbark --- --- Done (doc changes complete) oldest_to_newest 36091 0 lpapp 2013-08-30 11:32:41 +0000 The kernel name has changed lately [1] which is causing a kernel image name a bit different. That causes a break for CIs which are trying to archive the kernel image for later reuse, or any other useful scripts working with it. It is also a bit silly by default that double dash ("--") is used like uImage--3.2.1.... According to the change below, this seems to be related to the "PE" epoch variable. This regression happened to me from denzil to dylan, so I am proposing to extend the migration notes [2] with this. [1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=3b5fe6d2cd58b5db70c3d319ffc66b1cbff1f43a [2] http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.3/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html#migration 36092 1 lpapp 2013-08-30 11:40:58 +0000 It seems the module name has also changed, modules--3.2.1-r2-foo-20130829152142.tgz. It contains the "date" field which has not been there before. This also goes undocumented. Seems I will be busy today with fixing CI issues. :'( 36193 2 srifenbark 2013-09-03 13:11:22 +0000 I have updated the "Migration" chapter in the reference manual to include a new section that describes this change in Linux kernel binary filenames. I am marking the bug as "in review". Let me know of any issues. Thanks, Scott http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.5/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#1.3-linux-kernel-naming 36194 3 lpapp 2013-09-03 13:13:53 +0000 The documentation part is OK for me, thanks. 36195 4 srifenbark 2013-09-03 13:17:18 +0000 Thanks Laszlo.