<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>5290</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2013-09-30 09:04:08 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Failure to build dtb for zc702-ram.dts</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2013-10-15 08:47:25 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>BSPs</product>
          <component>bsps-meta-xilinx</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>arm</op_sys>
          <bug_status>VERIFIED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>major</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.5</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="George Nita">george.nita</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Phlip Balister">philip</assigned_to>
          <cc>alexandrux.palalau</cc>
    
    <cc>jessica.zhang</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.layer.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
    
    <cc>valentin.cobelea</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37331</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="George Nita">george.nita</who>
    <bug_when>2013-09-30 09:04:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = &quot;1.20.0&quot;
BUILD_SYS         = &quot;x86_64-linux&quot;
NATIVELSBSTRING   = &quot;Ubuntu-12.10&quot;
TARGET_SYS        = &quot;arm-poky-linux-gnueabi&quot;
MACHINE           = &quot;zynq-zc702&quot;
DISTRO            = &quot;poky&quot;
DISTRO_VERSION    = &quot;1.5&quot;
TUNE_FEATURES     = &quot;armv7a vfp neon&quot;
TARGET_FPU        = &quot;vfp-neon&quot;
meta
meta-yocto
meta-yocto-bsp
meta-zynq

The error message:
| NOTE: make -j 64 /media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/zc702-ram.dts
| make[2]: Nothing to be done for `/media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/zc702-ram.dts&apos;.
| install: cannot stat `/media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/linux-zynq-zc702-standard-build/arch/arm/boot//media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/zc702-ram.dts&apos;: No such file or directory
| WARNING: /media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/temp/run.do_install.33714:1 exit 1 from
|   install -m 0644 ${DTB_PATH} /media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/image/boot/devicetree-${DTB_SYMLINK_NAME}.dtb
| ERROR: Function failed: do_install (log file is located at /media/sdd1/fb/geni/master-eneaB/bldzynq/tmp/work/zynq_zc702-poky-linux-gnueabi/linux-zynq/3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0/temp/log.do_install.33714)
NOTE: recipe linux-zynq-3.8+gitAUTOINC+6a0bedad60-r4.0: task do_install: Failed</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37365</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Phlip Balister">philip</who>
    <bug_when>2013-09-30 17:14:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I have informed the meta-xilinx list.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37378</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Nathan Rossi">nathan</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-01 01:54:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If you have no strict requirements to use the meta-zynq layer, I recommended that you use the meta-xilinx layer for Zynq support in yocto, as Xilinx provides this layer for use with its chips. And it is tracking support of Yocto 1.5.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-xilinx/</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37420</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Phlip Balister">philip</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-01 14:23:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I have changed the READ on my meta-zynq repo to point at the official meta-xilinx layer.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37449</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="George Nita">george.nita</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-02 09:33:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; If you have no strict requirements to use the meta-zynq layer, I recommended
&gt; that you use the meta-xilinx layer for Zynq support in yocto, as Xilinx
&gt; provides this layer for use with its chips. And it is tracking support of
&gt; Yocto 1.5.
&gt; http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-xilinx/

Thank you, I&apos;ve done a successful build on meta-xilinx and will use it from now.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37450</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="George Nita">george.nita</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-02 09:34:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; I have changed the READ on my meta-zynq repo to point at the official
&gt; meta-xilinx layer.

Thank you, I&apos;ll use meta-xilinx from now on.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37483</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Saul Wold">sgw</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-02 13:35:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If using the meta-xilinx works, why re-open this bug?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37484</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="George Nita">george.nita</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-02 13:41:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Don&apos;t know how it got reopened.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37488</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="George Nita">george.nita</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-02 14:42:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>If this layer is not maintained any more, maybe it worth making a log entry stating that it&apos;s not a good choice and that meta-xilinx is.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>37924</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Palalau">alexandrux.palalau</who>
    <bug_when>2013-10-15 08:47:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Switching to verified as per last comments.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>