5369 2013-10-18 16:58:31 +0000 Create test plan to do performance analysis of x32 runtime 2017-12-06 16:47:39 +0000 1 1 10 QA/Testing Test Plans/Suite test-plans/suite 1.6 x86 Multiple RESOLVED OBSOLETE Medium+ enhancement 2.3 M2 4144 1 sgw humberto.ibarra.lopez alexandru.c.georgescu bluelightning corneliux.stoicescu jose.perez.carranza leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez sgw todor.minchev --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 38061 0 sgw 2013-10-18 16:58:31 +0000 38715 1 alexandru.c.georgescu 2013-11-12 10:47:50 +0000 Saul, Do we need only x32? 40831 2 ionutx.chisanovici 2014-03-03 11:16:57 +0000 Hi Saul, Did you think at something special for these runtime performance tests ? Cheers, Ionut C 40851 3 ionutx.chisanovici 2014-03-04 07:48:15 +0000 Hi Saul, See 5903. Thanks, Ionut C 42870 4 alexandru.c.georgescu 2014-04-23 08:16:19 +0000 bumping this to 1.7 44373 5 ionutx.chisanovici 2014-07-08 09:22:03 +0000 Moved to M4 as we want to use Lava server as a data collection tool for the performance testing. As agreed with RP and Paul E., we will first start with Lava installation then we should start collection boot time for the images. Cheers, Ionut C 69054 6 humberto.ibarra.lopez 2016-12-12 21:31:50 +0000 There is a related bug that might be implementing this already, bug is 10500. Sent mail about this and waiting for answers. 69990 7 humberto.ibarra.lopez 2017-01-22 13:06:26 +0000 3 year old bug, marking as obsolete since the umbrella bug for this one has been marked obsolete too. Runtime performance bugs are being reevaluated and #10951 will deal with that now. Probably a new bug for test plans of runtime performance will be created attached to 10951 soon.