5424 2013-10-30 16:08:27 +0000 Rationalise core-image.bbclass and image.bbclass 2018-04-18 15:56:55 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 1.6 All Multiple RESOLVED INVALID Low enhancement Future 1 bluelightning bluelightning meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher sgw srifenbark --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 38314 0 bluelightning 2013-10-30 16:08:27 +0000 We have a slightly arbitrary split between what's in core-image.bbclass and what's in image.bbclass - this historically derives from the old Poky structure which OE-Core inherited. We need to look at whether it's appropriate to move any of these items to image.bbclass (we should certainly move PACKAGE_GROUP_package-management and then package-management can be dropped from IMAGE_FEATURES[validitems] there also). 40933 1 bluelightning 2014-03-06 16:48:24 +0000 I've sent a patch to at least move package-management over to image.bbclass; the rest will need to wait until 1.7. 40981 2 bluelightning 2014-03-07 17:06:09 +0000 Aforementioned package-management change now merged for 1.6: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=874ab5a568ddbd5b140915c1330e6513e9892666 51405 3 srifenbark 2015-06-01 22:21:26 +0000 Paul, I have a section http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.9/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#remove-package-management-requirements that mentions package-management. I think we are technically okay here as we are telling the user to be sure that package-management is not in their IMAGE_FEATURES statement. It looks like the result of your patch here removed package-management from that statement. Are we okay with the "Remove Package Management Requirements" section as it is? Aside from this point, I don't know of any other potential changes to the docs for this bug once it is fixed. If there are, can you tell me? Thanks, Scott 51784 4 bluelightning 2015-06-18 11:59:24 +0000 It's too early to be sure of what documentation changes are needed. To be honest I think we have more pressing things to do so I'm going to mark this as Future for now. 77029 5 sjolley.yp.pm 2017-09-21 15:21:38 +0000 Still a valid issue. 80305 6 bluelightning 2018-04-18 15:56:23 +0000 Looking at this again, it's not clear that we would move anything else from core-image to image, though we probably ought to evaluate what's in core-image to see if it still makes good sense. However we should open up a new bug when we have a bit more of a concrete idea of what we want to do. 80306 7 bluelightning 2018-04-18 15:56:55 +0000 .