5521 2013-11-13 16:26:39 +0000 Document file checksums 2014-06-19 04:54:29 +0000 1 1 9 Documentation Development Manual development unspecified All Multiple RESOLVED FIXED 02 June 2014: RESOLVED Medium enhancement 1.7 M2 1 bluelightning srifenbark bluelightning sgw srifenbark --- --- Done (doc changes complete) oldest_to_newest 38743 0 bluelightning 2013-11-13 16:26:39 +0000 It seems we don't currently document that we take a checksum of every local file mentioned in SRC_URI for a recipe, and insert those checksums into the signature for do_fetch, thus if one of those files is modified, do_fetch and all tasks that depend on it will be re-executed. I'm not sure where in the documentation this would fit in, but it might be something we can squeeze into the new "creating a new recipe workflow" section. 38885 1 srifenbark 2013-11-18 18:13:33 +0000 Paul, We could also mention this in the "Closer Look" section where we discuss fetching source files. Scott 39644 2 srifenbark 2014-01-02 19:52:56 +0000 Paul, I mention these checksums in the new "Writing a New Recipe" section now. See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.6/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#new-recipe-fetching-code. It is down towards the end of the section. Also, in the same overall section in "Licensing", there is some discussion of checksums. See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.6/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#new-recipe-licensing. Additionally, there is stuff in http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.6/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#usingpoky-configuring-LIC_FILES_CHKSUM. I am not sure how much (if any of this) you would consider contributing to this bug. Maybe you can comment on that. I think one area that we could mention this is in the SRC_URI variable description of the glossary. 39646 3 bluelightning 2014-01-02 20:35:20 +0000 I'm afraid this is not related to LIC_FILES_CHKSUM at all; these checksums are internal ones taken for local files so we can detect when they are changed and force a fetch to occur. 39647 4 srifenbark 2014-01-02 21:29:41 +0000 What about the stuff in the "Writing a New Recipe" section? Don't those have to do with SRC_URI? 39650 5 bluelightning 2014-01-02 21:40:50 +0000 They do have to do with SRC_URI yes, but those explicit SRC_URI checksums are for *remote* files. Other than that a checksum is being used, and SRC_URI is involved, this feature is not related to either SRC_URI[md5sum]/SRC_URI[sha256sum] or LIC_FILES_CHKSUM. 39651 6 srifenbark 2014-01-02 21:56:10 +0000 Okay - I will go back to square one on this. Thanks 42073 7 srifenbark 2014-04-01 22:36:46 +0000 Enhancement - moving to 1.7. 43704 8 srifenbark 2014-06-02 14:21:48 +0000 Hi, I have inserted a brief note here to deal with how the build system uses checksums during do_fetch to re-execute stuff if a file:// listed in the SRC_URI has had its contents modified. Paul has reviewed the note and approved. I am marking the bug RESOLVED and setting the doc flag to "Done". Thanks, Scott 44084 9 srifenbark 2014-06-19 04:54:29 +0000 Set to M2 to get it off the lists.