5568 2013-11-19 20:45:39 +0000 meta-intel: lms7_7.1.20.bb tarball no longer exists 2014-04-22 15:41:44 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BSPs bsps-meta-intel 1.6 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium normal 1.6 M1 1 tom.zanussi nitin.a.kamble dvhart tom.zanussi --- --- Don't know oldest_to_newest 38917 0 tom.zanussi 2013-11-19 20:45:39 +0000 The lms7_7.1.20.bb contains a URL that is no longer valid. The recipe should either be fixed or removed (is anything actually using the lms recipes, and if not, why?): WARNING: Checksum failure encountered with download of http://software.intel.com/file/37962;downloadfilename=lms+7.1.20.25.zip - will attempt other sources if available http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8011/builders/nightly-intel-gpl/builds/6/steps/Building%20Images/logs/stdio 38994 1 dvhart 2013-11-21 15:44:36 +0000 Nitin, can you please take a look. Unless someone really objects, I would think we could remove version 7 in favor of the version 8 recipe Nitin added. 39007 2 nitin.a.kamble 2013-11-21 18:30:00 +0000 ok, I will be taking out lms 7 recipe. BTW there is also lms 9 now. It would be better to replace lms 7 with lms 9. But I do not have any platform to validate lms 9. 39008 3 nitin.a.kamble 2013-11-21 18:38:13 +0000 chiefriver was the BSP using lms7, so with lms7 going away, shall we retire chiefriver BSP now? 39043 4 tom.zanussi 2013-11-22 19:46:38 +0000 I don't see how it follows that because a recipe that a BSP uses is obsolete that the BSP should go away. Shouldn't you update the lms support in the BSP instead? 39044 5 dvhart 2013-11-22 20:21:44 +0000 Agreeing with Tom here, is there any reason the BSP can't be updated to the later version of lms? 39045 6 nitin.a.kamble 2013-11-22 21:14:53 +0000 As per my understanding LMS version need to match the AMT version on the board. That is why we have multiple lmv versions in the tree. 39047 7 tom.zanussi 2013-11-22 21:40:21 +0000 The lms code does seem to have version-testing support, so it would seem later versions should support older versions. It would also be poor software design to discard backward-compatibility, especially if the older versions of the software go away as they have in this case. Which isn't to say that's not the way things actually are.. So, we should determine which is the case - if version 7 of the lms software has indeed gone away without any alternative e.g. backward support in version 8/9, then owners of that hardware are out of luck and the version 7 software needs to be put back up for download, and the only problem here is a broken link that needs to be restored. If on the other hand, version 7 hardware is handled by version 8 of lms as seems more likely, then we just upgrade to version 8. 39048 8 nitin.a.kamble 2013-11-22 21:48:15 +0000 I do not have any board with working AMT7, so there is no way for me to check weather the lms8 will work with AMT7 board. 39049 9 tom.zanussi 2013-11-22 21:57:14 +0000 This is confusing now because you wanted to get rid of the chiefriver BSP because there's no more lms7 software, which is what chiefrvier needs. If you don't have a chiefriver, does QA? 40952 10 nitin.a.kamble 2014-03-06 22:45:48 +0000 a patch is out on ML to fix this 42821 11 nitin.a.kamble 2014-04-22 15:41:44 +0000 commit 0de8a3b488a09c69f99ccf8bf56354bea14240a9 Author: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com> Date: Wed Mar 5 15:13:57 2014 -0800 lms7: update the source download URL The old URL is not working anymore. Using a new URL for source zip file. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>