5580 2013-11-21 13:33:57 +0000 deb, rpm and ipk packages have different naming formats 2014-01-14 10:17:40 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 1.6 x86 Multiple VERIFIED NOTABUG Medium normal Future 1 corneliux.stoicescu bluelightning meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 38983 0 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-11-21 13:33:57 +0000 Building 'm4' for all package types, the following package names result: m4-1.4.17-r0.x86_64.rpm m4_1.4.17-r0_x86-64.deb m4_1.4.17-r0_x86_64.ipk All 3 are different from each other. There should be an universal package naming format. 38985 1 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-11-21 13:48:39 +0000 This is necessary for automating some builtime tests with oe-selftest. 38999 2 bluelightning 2013-11-21 16:06:35 +0000 I'm fairly sure this is expected, although Richard comments that the deb naming might be broken and nobody noticed. I'd like to get an idea of what we're trying to do with the test and see if there is a different way of handling the situation than knowing the output file name format. 39024 3 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-11-22 10:43:01 +0000 I looked more into this and the package naming conventions ofr these formats are as follow: rpm: name-version-release.architecture.rpm deb: <foo>_<VersionNumber>-<DebianRevisionNumber>_<DebianArchitecture>.deb ipk: name_major.minor-wrt<revision>_arch.ipk This means the naming is correct. Marking as NOTABUG. 39785 4 corneliux.stoicescu 2014-01-14 10:17:40 +0000 Setting to verified.