6034 2014-03-25 04:08:31 +0000 ICE with -O1 and -g on mips (internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20810) 2014-12-08 18:44:57 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core devtools / tool chain 1.6 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Low normal 1.8 1 hongxu.jia hongxu.jia bluelightning liezhi.yang Martin.Jansa meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher raj.khem richard.purdie ross.burton sgw --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 41657 0 hongxu.jia 2014-03-25 04:08:31 +0000 I have hit a ICE and could reduce it to the following minimal example: 1. Only the size of array assigned with 2 caused the issue: $ cat > mipgcc-test.c << END #include <stdio.h> #define ARRAY_SIZE_MAX 2 int main (int argc, char **argv) { char *pStrArry[ARRAY_SIZE_MAX] = {"hello"}; int i = 0; while(pStrArry[i] && i<ARRAY_SIZE_MAX) { printf("%s\n", pStrArry[i]); i++; } return 0; } END 2. Only -O1 and -g on mips caused the issue: $ mips-poky-linux-gcc -O1 -g -o mipgcc-test mipgcc-test.c mipgcc-test.c: In function 'main': mipgcc-test.c:18:1: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_var_location, at dwarf2out.c:20810 } ^ Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions 41658 1 hongxu.jia 2014-03-25 04:10:32 +0000 Also File the bug to GNU: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643 46411 2 raj.khem 2014-10-17 10:41:20 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Also File the bug to GNU: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643 This bug was marked as WORKSFORME mistakenly by upstream gcc developers I have explained the issue more and gave a reason why upstream developers testcase was wrong. Please reopen the bug upstream. I can not do this since I am not originator of bug. 46982 3 sgw 2014-11-13 16:22:39 +0000 Please follow-up on Khem's request to reopen this bug 47271 4 hongxu.jia 2014-12-02 02:26:47 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Also File the bug to GNU: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643 > > This bug was marked as WORKSFORME mistakenly by upstream gcc developers > I have explained the issue more and gave a reason why upstream developers > testcase was wrong. Please reopen the bug upstream. I can not do this since > I am not originator of bug. Hi Khem I could not reopen it neither, it didn't have that option. so choose 'unconfirmed' to instead 47274 5 raj.khem 2014-12-02 05:31:05 +0000 It seems to have been fixed upstream, can you back port below commit and retest https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9fcfed2eb95fea03d967dfcadd1eec9cbab4a744 47275 6 hongxu.jia 2014-12-02 05:34:18 +0000 (In reply to comment #5) > It seems to have been fixed upstream, can you back port below commit and > retest > > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff; > h=9fcfed2eb95fea03d967dfcadd1eec9cbab4a744 Got it, I am doing the test //Hongxu 47280 7 hongxu.jia 2014-12-02 09:29:00 +0000 I have built core-image-sato-sdk and runqemu qemumips to do the above testing. The ICE defect doesn't exist on the current gcc ... commit fd9fc495f12c78a4f62bda5919b2ef73c9584e0b Author: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Thu Nov 27 14:58:11 2014 +0000 gcc-4.8: Drop unused patc ... So I directly close these defect //Hongxu