<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6158</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2014-04-14 10:27:43 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Encourage best-practice configuration usage</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2026-10-23 08:13:43 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>9</classification_id>
          <classification>Documentation</classification>
          <product>General Docs</product>
          <component>docs-general</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>IN PROGRESS DESIGN</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>20 January 2015: IN PROGRESS DESIGN </status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>6.2 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Antonin Godard">antonin.godard</assigned_to>
          <cc>belen.barros.pena</cc>
    
    <cc>bluelightning</cc>
    
    <cc>kristi</cc>
    
    <cc>mark.morton</cc>
    
    <cc>michael.opdenacker</cc>
    
    <cc>randy.macleod</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
    
    <cc>srifenbark</cc>
    
    <cc>tim.orling</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>Yes (doc changes required)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>42639</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2014-04-14 10:27:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In a lot of places we suggest to add things to local.conf. For quick testing this is fine, but I think that we ought to be encouraging best practice particularly for certain variables by recommending that people set them in their custom distro config (or machine config, depending on the variable).

Some of this is about marking variables in the glossary, but I think it&apos;s also about the recommendations we make as part of &quot;how-to&quot; sections where we tell already people where to set variables - most of the time we just say &quot;set this in local.conf&quot;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>43491</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2014-05-22 08:56:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Setting this future.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>43977</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2014-06-16 11:39:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>See Bug 5601 for related information that needs to be captured.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>47151</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2014-11-21 19:59:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hi, 

I have created a form for the variables that uses a small PNG file to visually represent where a user would set a variable.  For now, the PNG image is simply a placeholder.  We need to agree on some short wordings to place in the figure to represent local.conf, machine conf file, user-doesn&apos;t set, etc.  

Part of this context information needs to be used for the documentation.conf file as well (see bug 5601 for related information).  Once we get the context areas nailed down, we can include that information between each variable&apos;s &lt;info&gt;&lt;/info&gt; tag, which currently holds just the short description used by documentation.conf.

You can see the work in progress at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref-variables-glos

Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>48455</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2015-01-30 20:26:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Paul, 

I need to get some feedback from you on the PNG files we want to use here to indicate context for these variables.  Once I have that, I can move forward.

Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54470</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-22 15:29:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Setting to 3.0 days.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>77109</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-25 15:53:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This bug has lost traction... At one point I had a small little figure worked out to tell the user where to best set a variable.  Is that still a viable solution?  

Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>77119</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-25 19:29:57 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I can&apos;t recall if I saw any tests of this earlier, but I think so, yes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>77122</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2017-09-25 20:27:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok - if it is still viable then I will try to get some progress on it with you Paul but after 2.4. 

Thanks</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>100005</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Randy MacLeod">randy.macleod</who>
    <bug_when>2024-10-24 15:03:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bulk move of 5.1 M4 to 5.2 M2 as approved by AlexB.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>102181</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Antonin Godard">antonin.godard</who>
    <bug_when>2025-06-06 07:42:30 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bulk move of bugs I am assigned to from Milestone 5.2M4 to 5.3M1.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>