635 2011-01-06 16:11:44 +0000 add documentation for swabber 2013-03-26 16:04:33 +0000 1 1 9 Documentation Quick Start quick-start unspecified x86 Multiple VERIFIED WONTFIX 24 April 2012: Note added Low enhancement 1.4 1 kevin.tian srifenbark alex.devries alexandrux.palalau corneliux.stoicescu jessica.zhang poky.doc.watcher poky.watcher richard.purdie sgw --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 11408 0 kevin.tian 2011-01-06 16:11:44 +0000 now there's no doc about swabber usage, like how to activate it, how to interpret the report, etc. 12048 1 srifenbark 2011-02-24 05:27:42 +0000 This needs to be researched. At one point it was suggested that WR should provide this documentation. I sent a feeler out for that solution and got no response. Target Milestone should be 1.1 but I can't set it. 12080 2 alex.devries 2011-02-24 12:22:53 +0000 Here's some information that should help: The existing swabber documentation is probably a good place to start. You can find that here: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/swabber/tree/README Some other things that are specific to Yocto: - to enable swabber processing in Yocto, local.conf says this: # include 'image-swab' to perform host system intrusion detection - build times might be three times longer - you'll find output in: tmp/log/swabber/ I think that's it, though. 15534 3 srifenbark 2011-08-17 16:12:47 +0000 No time to create prior to the 1.1 release. I have changed the status back to ACCEPTED. 15678 4 srifenbark 2011-08-23 17:18:31 +0000 Post 1.1. This is an enhancement. 20853 5 srifenbark 2012-04-24 23:02:13 +0000 I don't know how to categorize this one. It does not fit in any manual at this point. 20935 6 jessica.zhang 2012-05-01 16:26:12 +0000 We need to have swabber work first 27363 7 richard.purdie 2012-11-12 16:25:01 +0000 swabber doens't work. No point in documenting it until it does. 27364 8 srifenbark 2012-11-12 16:28:03 +0000 Well - I guess it is moot. Thanks. 31121 9 alexandrux.palalau 2013-03-25 15:15:33 +0000 Hi guys, Do we have any update on this? Thanks 31122 10 richard.purdie 2013-03-25 15:20:22 +0000 No update, swabber is a dead project at this point and we don't have work on a replacement scheduled right now. Its still a good idea but needs replanning. 31124 11 alex.devries 2013-03-25 15:44:40 +0000 I agree with this position. Drop it. I wrote swabber and have not maintained it. If anyone wants to write a replacement, I'm happy to talk to them about what to do and (more importantly) not to do. 31177 12 corneliux.stoicescu 2013-03-26 16:04:33 +0000 Verified as per last 2 comments. Please open a new bug if you wish to "revive" swabber :)