6660 2014-08-24 18:55:00 +0000 Compare sstate packages within SDK publishing tool 2019-06-20 11:29:54 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core devtools / tool chain 1.7 All Multiple RESOLVED OBSOLETE Medium enhancement 4.99 6559 6659 6992 1 bluelightning bluelightning liezhi.yang meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher Qi.Chen randy.macleod richard.purdie stephano --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 45240 0 bluelightning 2014-08-24 18:55:00 +0000 Extend the tool in bug 6659 to add the ability to compare the output sstate packages to see if they have materially changed. Those that have not can be preserved in the manifest in order to reduce the amount an existing user needs to download in order to upgrade. (Note: if the manifest is also embedded within the SDK that will also need to be updated). 54041 1 Qi.Chen 2015-09-15 02:30:38 +0000 Module: openembedded-core.git Branch: master Commit: c201ab826046b30281341107b3e6a35204f5c9d8 URL: http://git.openembedded.org/?p=openembedded-core.git&a=commit;h=c201ab826046b30281341107b3e6a35204f5c9d8 Author: Qi.Chen@windriver.com <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> Date: Mon Sep 7 13:42:26 2015 +0100 oe-publish-sdk: add script Add a script to publish an extensible SDK that has previously been built to a specified destination. This published SDK is intended to be accessed by the devtool sdk-update command from an installed copy of the extensible SDK. e.g. oe-publish-sdk <ext-sdk> <destination> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> 54050 2 bluelightning 2015-09-15 08:47:26 +0000 Does oe-publish-sdk actually do comparisons of the packages in order to determine if they should be published or not? 54059 3 Qi.Chen 2015-09-15 09:25:18 +0000 Sorry, I misunderstood it. Reopen this bug. //Qi 68317 4 Qi.Chen 2016-11-15 06:43:27 +0000 I'll look at the latest situation of devtool and see how to fit into that. 79918 5 stephano 2018-03-22 08:17:43 +0000 Please look into whether or not this feature is still relevant. 84274 6 bluelightning 2019-06-20 11:29:54 +0000 So I believe as of recently this is now handled in a different way through the sstate hash equivalency functionality, so marking as resolved.