6741 2014-09-18 21:37:42 +0000 We should optionally support libubsan, liblsan, and so on. 2015-06-01 19:18:17 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core devtools / tool chain 1.7 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium enhancement Future 1 seebs seebs meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher ross.burton --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 45699 0 seebs 2014-09-18 21:37:42 +0000 gcc has some code sanitizer features, which are currently neither built nor packaged so far as I know, but it might be nice to add support for them. (Noticed because one of our binary toolchains has the libraries, but nothing packages them yet.) 45838 1 ross.burton 2014-09-25 14:44:14 +0000 There's a patch on the list (http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/80369/) that adds a libsanitizer recipe, which packages: /usr/lib/libasan.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/liblsan.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libtsan.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libubsan.so.0.0.0 Is this everything you wanted? 51399 2 ross.burton 2015-06-01 19:18:17 +0000 The patch was merged as of 1709bf0c3a84bb04bc52e9104ad8e09fba6c6f91.