<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>684</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2011-01-28 01:54:19 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>On qemuarm, the command &apos;poweroff/shutdown&apos; can&apos;t close the qemu completely and exit to host console with Laverne build 20110121</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2014-11-12 07:20:19 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>OE-Core</product>
          <component>core</component>
          <version>1.3</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          <see_also>http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100</see_also>
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>(Scheduled)</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>1.7</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Liang Wang">liangliang.wang</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Chen Qi">Qi.Chen</assigned_to>
          <cc>ada-mihaela.solcan</cc>
    
    <cc>alexandru.c.georgescu</cc>
    
    <cc>amy.fong</cc>
    
    <cc>corneliux.stoicescu</cc>
    
    <cc>dvhart</cc>
    
    <cc>jessica.zhang</cc>
    
    <cc>jiajun.xu</cc>
    
    <cc>liang.li2</cc>
    
    <cc>liangliang.wang</cc>
    
    <cc>liezhi.yang</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.mr.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
    
    <cc>song.liu</cc>
    
    <cc>venkatarg</cc>
    
    <cc>yi.zhao</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Yi Zhao">yi.zhao</qa_contact>
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>Don&apos;t know</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11563</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Liang Wang">liangliang.wang</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-28 01:54:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Testing Environment
===============================
Host: qemuarm sato/sdk
Kernel: 
Image location: http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org/nightly/20110121-1/qemu/qemuarm/


Steps
===============================
1. Boot up the qemuarm with sato/sdk image
2. Open a Terminal and run &apos;poweroff/shutdown -h now&apos; 

Observed Result
===============================
1. The command &apos;poweroff/shutdown&apos; can&apos;t close the qemu completely and exit to host console.
2. The &apos;Shutdown&apos; icon on desktop can close the qemu completely and exit to host console.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11570</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jiajun Xu">jiajun.xu</who>
    <bug_when>2011-01-28 05:50:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Pls. be noted that the bug is for laverne build (20110121), not for master.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>11665</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Saul Wold">sgw</who>
    <bug_when>2011-02-02 08:30:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This is related to bug 100, and shutdown still needs to be addressed for Qemuarm which may require kernel or qemu changes.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>12260</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2011-03-03 17:54:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I put this as an enhancement, since this is actually consistent with the hardware behaviour!</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>13488</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2011-04-28 19:22:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>There are no plans to fix this, since it is behaving consistent with the hardware, it&apos;s
a low value fix and definitely not needed for 1.0.1, so moving out the milestone on 
this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17681</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-15 15:20:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think this can be closed as WONTFIX. We can make these systems halt at reboot and that&apos;s about as good as it can get and is consistent with the real hardware they emulate.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17682</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-15 15:21:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, can we make the poweroff/shutdown commands reboot these machines? Is there some way we can indicate to those commands to reboot?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17701</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-16 07:13:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Josh had a suggestion for just mapping the poweroff/shutdown to
reboot (both command line and sato) and it met with luke warm comments.

I support the mapping, but others who probably didn&apos;t realize that even
the hardware wouldn&apos;t support that, proposed fixing the problem. Which
with a lot of digging we could do, but isn&apos;t a great use of time or value add.

So if we want to just go ahead with mapping these commands, I have no
issue with it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>17785</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2011-12-21 09:05:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Hmm. I take that back, I was running the sysroot git. 

&gt; which git
/home/bruce/poky/build/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/bin/git
yow-bashfiel-l1 [/home/bruc...8-r2/linux]&gt; git --version
git version 1.7.7

I&apos;ll check to see if for some reason the host git is being run by the kgit* scripts.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20937</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Jessica">jessica.zhang</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-01 16:30:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Any update from last comments?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>20969</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-01 21:48:46 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The last comment was from the wrong bug. There still are no plans to fix this, since we match hardware. If we update to a new emulated platform (i.e. the vexpress), we can fix this in the kernel. If we want to map the buttons to different commands, that&apos;s another question and someone that works on sato would
want to do that.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>21388</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Darren Hart">dvhart</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-16 21:37:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Bruce, moved to 1.3 M2, can you please provide an Estimate?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>21391</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2012-05-16 22:05:40 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>10d days is the estimate for updating the BSP.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>23182</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
    <who name="Bruce Ashfield">bruce.ashfield</who>
    <bug_when>2012-07-18 01:41:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Moving this to future. The qemuarm A9+ BSPs that are supported out
of the yocto version of qemu do not support disk boot, and hence are
not valid options. 

For yocto 1.3+ we can update the machine and resolve this issue, but fixing
it on the existing machine is very low value for the time it will take.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26347</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Stoicescu Cornel">corneliux.stoicescu</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-08 15:43:45 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reproduced on branch &quot;danny&quot;:
commit 86c9aa8081f107420cd3763d0566d779daddc2b1
Date:   Wed Oct 3 11:01:51 2012 -0700

Last message from console: &quot;System halted&quot;</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>26908</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Saul Wold">sgw</who>
    <bug_when>2012-10-25 14:56:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 3335 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>40171</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Ada Solcan">ada-mihaela.solcan</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-04 09:33:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reproduced on master:
Commit 1a9226f140f578f11696abf1a3c989fae1d4c14a
Date:   Thu Jan 23 12:10:01 2014 +0000
Host: Ubuntu 13.10 &amp; Fedora 20

Last message from console: &quot;System halted&quot;

This issue does not reproduce with the previous commit: e4c23f7bcb79072ea6028fbdf8f3f0dc17a63371 from Jan 14</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>40172</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Georgescu">alexandru.c.georgescu</who>
    <bug_when>2014-02-04 09:38:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Actually, this happens with NFS and with an *.ext3 image, like: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20140123-3/machines/qemu/qemuarm/core-image-sato-qemuarm.ext3</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46805</commentid>
    <comment_count>18</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2014-11-06 15:57:08 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Since this matches the hardware and has low value, marking as WONTFIX (or really CANTFIX).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>46932</commentid>
    <comment_count>19</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexandru Georgescu">alexandru.c.georgescu</who>
    <bug_when>2014-11-12 07:20:19 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Adding Yi.

Yi, I think we can keep the test case but stop attaching this bug to our qemuarm test runs. Also, please update the test case by attaching the bug link and also the test case should reflect the bug&apos;s resolution.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>