6945 2014-11-07 21:39:35 +0000 kernel-dev: multiple kernel build 2016-07-29 15:37:23 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core kernel 1.8 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium+ enhancement 2.2 M1 1 bruce.ashfield zhe.he alexander.kanevskiy alexandru.c.georgescu bruce.ashfield eduard.bartosh igor.stoppa jose.perez.carranza maciejjo net147 randy.macleod richard.purdie ross.burton tkilbourn tom.zanussi zhe.he david.israelx.rodriguez.castellanos --- --- Don't know oldest_to_newest 46880 0 bruce.ashfield 2014-11-07 21:39:35 +0000 This has come up from Wind River before (install kernel and BSP kernel), from me (Real Time kernel and Mainline kernel), and now again with another project where we have a development kernel and want to easily compare it with the mainline base of the that kernel. It should be possible to build multiple kernels and install them to the target. If the bootloader supports it, the different options should be available at boot time for user selection. 49782 1 net147 2015-03-26 06:53:48 +0000 Another use case would be if you want to build and install a kdump kernel to capture dumps when the system kernel crashes. 50759 2 dvhart 2015-05-04 16:46:16 +0000 Bruce, assigning to you from a core kernel feature perspective and with WRL interest present. Setting estimate to 15 perfect days as it is a significant feature with a lot of core work. 50760 3 bruce.ashfield 2015-05-04 16:51:19 +0000 Reducing to 2, since this is something that is developing internal to Wind River and will be contributed. I'm just the placeholder name for this. 51430 4 igor.stoppa 2015-06-02 17:56:41 +0000 Would this support deploying 2 kernels, each of them to a separate partition? I have a case where I would like to have a service/rescue partition and a normal one. Each should receive its own specific kernel, possibly built with both different codebase and different additional patches. 51434 5 bruce.ashfield 2015-06-02 19:50:05 +0000 (In reply to comment #4) > Would this support deploying 2 kernels, each of them to a separate partition? > > I have a case where I would like to have a service/rescue partition and a > normal one. Each should receive its own specific kernel, possibly built with > both different codebase and different additional patches. This will support the deployment to multiple locations. There are two parts to this, the build, and the management of the kernels on the system. The packaging are changes to the build, while the management on the target is an augmentation of the alternates mechanism to manage the kernels .. where ever they may be. 57797 6 tkilbourn 2016-01-13 18:17:33 +0000 This will be useful for me as well. Any update on the progress? Thanks! 63164 7 maciejjo 2016-06-21 06:30:25 +0000 Hi - will this enhancement support multiple kernel versions (as in 4.1 alongside 4.4) or only building one version of kernel but with multiple image types (zImage, uImage etc)? 63170 8 zhe.he 2016-06-21 07:09:30 +0000 http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?id=0437a59e3c298d40aaa96af09b80bff8fcbe292d 63171 9 zhe.he 2016-06-21 07:10:53 +0000 Maciej, this is just for building multiple types of kernel images at one time.