7202 2015-01-20 15:10:18 +0000 Test for linux-dummy 2016-11-03 18:15:54 +0000 1 1 10 QA/Testing Build Testing general unspecified All Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium enhancement 2.3 7884 1 bluelightning jose.perez.carranza alexandru.c.georgescu leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez sgw david.israelx.rodriguez.castellanos --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 48077 0 bluelightning 2015-01-20 15:10:18 +0000 The linux-dummy recipe is used when you're building your own kernel outside of the build system. We often forget to update linux-dummy recipe when we make changes to how the kernel is built, so we should add a test to ensure it continues to function as a replacement at build time for the kernel. 49938 1 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-03-31 05:42:02 +0000 Setting up for 1.9 50180 2 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-04-09 14:49:21 +0000 Assigning this to Costin. Not sure if we can do this with oe-selftest 50181 3 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-04-09 14:50:03 +0000 Assigning this to Costin. Not sure if we can do this with oe-selftest 51190 4 costin.c.constantin 2015-05-21 11:38:22 +0000 I'll just have a look. In essence (i guess) all there is to add is a test to build the linux-dummy and check the exit code of bitbake. Costin 51194 5 bluelightning 2015-05-21 12:24:16 +0000 Well, we need to do a bit more than that - you'd need to actually set PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-dummy" and then build an image e.g. core-image-minimal. You'd then need to check that linux-dummy did actually get built, and that there were no "multiple providers are available for" messages printed. 51640 6 costin.c.constantin 2015-06-11 13:36:21 +0000 Hi Paul, I tried your recommendations and the image didn't build. I think there is an issue and will open a separate bug. Costin 51847 7 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-06-22 12:07:39 +0000 Costin, can you paste the bug no here? 51848 8 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-06-22 12:08:25 +0000 (In reply to comment #7) > Costin, can you paste the bug no here? bug 7884 51849 9 alexandru.c.georgescu 2015-06-22 12:09:55 +0000 (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Costin, can you paste the bug no here? > > bug 7884 Updating the bug milestone which depends on bug 7884 (no milestone set) 52047 10 costin.c.constantin 2015-06-30 12:26:42 +0000 Hello, After following the indications of 7884, the image built successfully. Still messages like: "NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime kernel-base (linux-yocto, linux-yocto-tiny, linux-yocto-rt) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match kernel-base" are present during build time. I checked however if linux-dummy is built and found under /build/tmp/deploy/rpm$ ls ./i586/linux-dummy-dbg-1.0-r1.i586.rpm ./i586/linux-dummy-dev-1.0-r1.i586.rpm I can see some "activity" under build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/linux-dummy/1.0-r1$ ls COPYING.GPL deploy-rpms image license-destdir linux-dummy.spec package packages-split pkgdata pseudo sysroot-destdir temp alongside all related tasks log under build/tmp/work/i586-poky-linux/linux-dummy/1.0-r1/temp so i guess it did built. Thank you, Costin 52050 11 costin.c.constantin 2015-06-30 14:13:11 +0000 Hi, Auto test case implemented. Will submit it shortly. Costin 55077 12 ross.burton 2015-10-08 15:47:35 +0000 Costin, did you submit this? I can't see it in oe-core or on the list. 58569 13 alexandru.c.georgescu 2016-02-04 13:11:49 +0000 It won't make M2 59311 14 costin.c.constantin 2016-02-21 17:15:35 +0000 patch sent for review. 59312 15 costin.c.constantin 2016-02-21 17:55:11 +0000 ... forgot to add patch location: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-February/117819.html 67609 16 jose.perez.carranza 2016-10-26 20:15:08 +0000 the version 2 of the patch is here http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-February/118260.html 67930 17 jose.perez.carranza 2016-11-03 18:15:54 +0000 Already merged on master http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=c3d2df883a9d6d5036277114339673656d89a728