7476 2015-03-18 10:11:15 +0000 Improve license manifest description 2025-02-14 16:48:24 +0000 1 1 9 Documentation Development Manual development 1.8 All Multiple RESOLVED FIXED Medium enhancement Future 1 bluelightning simone.p.weiss bluelightning elizabeth.flanagan idadelm paul randy.macleod ross.burton sgw simone.p.weiss tracy.graydon vineela.tummalapalli --- --- Yes (doc changes required) oldest_to_newest 49528 0 bluelightning 2015-03-18 10:11:15 +0000 We could do with a bit more detail in the "Maintaining Open Source License Compliance..." section in the dev manual. In particular, we need to decribe exactly what files we write out for images and packages and what they should be expected to contain. 60302 1 srifenbark 2016-03-22 18:16:08 +0000 Tracy... Once I have this information I can get it into the dev-manual. Thanks, Scott 87153 2 mark.morton 2020-05-06 09:38:31 +0000 This bug is five years old - where can I get current information concerning the open source files and packages? Does the archiver class not fit this requirement? See https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/3.1/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#maintaining-open-source-license-compliance-during-your-products-lifecycle 87162 3 sjolley.yp.pm 2020-05-07 07:24:16 +0000 Vineela, Can you answer Mark's question? 87166 4 randy.macleod 2020-05-07 07:53:47 +0000 Paul do you have any tips for Mark? 87396 5 vineela.tummalapalli 2020-06-03 15:53:50 +0000 The content in Mega manual to me looks good. Paul can you please provide the required inputs. 87414 6 randy.macleod 2020-06-04 07:59:51 +0000 Looking for someone to work on this bug. 88367 7 idadelm 2020-10-12 03:19:15 +0000 Will love to work on this bug. 88368 8 idadelm 2020-10-12 03:23:02 +0000 (In reply to comment #6) > Looking for someone to work on this bug. Will love to. 94218 9 ross.burton 2022-10-20 15:17:05 +0000 Turns out the relevant section of the documentation does need an update. Specifically it's been expanded a lot since this bug was filed, but now recommends using meta-spdxscanner instead of the integrated SPDX class. https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev-manual/common-tasks.html#providing-spdx-files 97972 10 simone.p.weiss 2024-01-24 21:30:35 +0000 (In reply to Ross Burton from comment #9) > Turns out the relevant section of the documentation does need an update. > Specifically it's been expanded a lot since this bug was filed, but now > recommends using meta-spdxscanner instead of the integrated SPDX class. > > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev-manual/common-tasks.html#providing-spdx- > files Checked the current state of the documentation. https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev/dev-manual/sbom.html#creating-a-software-bill-of-materials already recommends to use SPDX class. I would consider the Bug as obsolete/fixed already. Ross if you agree, I would suggest closing this bug, else a hint what is missing would be appreciated. 98117 11 simone.p.weiss 2024-02-02 05:40:11 +0000 OK checked docu vs create-spdx.bbclass. It is potrayed in the manual that just inheriting create-spdx in the conf will produce a spdx.json in ´ tmp/deploy/images/MACHINE/. That is not where I found the json on trying, it was in tmp/deploy/spdx/MACHINE not in images. At least that I will update for the documentation. 98130 12 simone.p.weiss 2024-02-05 16:01:10 +0000 Checked again with clean workspace, will just add notes for the new talk and reformat the options to make them more clear. 100963 13 randy.macleod 2025-02-14 16:46:22 +0000 bulk change to add Saul's non-WR address. 101070 14 randy.macleod 2025-02-14 16:48:24 +0000 Bulk change: Remove Saul's old WR address.