<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>8028</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-07-17 15:05:58 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Garbage in SDK manifest file</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-10-03 19:48:22 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>OE-Core</product>
          <component>core</component>
          <version>1.8</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.0.3</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Armin Kuster">akuster</assigned_to>
          <cc>benjamin.esquivel</cc>
    
    <cc>bogdanx.a.voiculescu</cc>
    
    <cc>mariano.lopez</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.mr.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>meta.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>ross.burton</cc>
    
    <cc>yi.zhao</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Bogdan Alexandru Voiculescu">bogdanx.a.voiculescu</qa_contact>
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52469</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-17 15:05:58 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I just build an SDK (bitbake -c populate_sdk core-image-minimal) and both the host and target manifests seem to be prefixed with some log output that shouldn&apos;t be there (presumably from berkeleydb, I&apos;m using RPM packaging):

------------- snip -------------
BDB2053 Freeing read
BDB2053 Freeing read
BDB2053 Freeing read
BDB2053 Freeing read
BDB2053 Freeing read
binutils-cross-canadian-x86-64 x86_64-nativesdk 2.25
gcc-cross-canadian-x86-64 x86_64-nativesdk 4.9.3
...
------------- snip -------------</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>52719</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-07-29 22:17:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not able to reproduce the bug. I have found these tracebacks are because something crashes while reading the rpmdb or exists without cleaning. I would like to reproduce it in order to start working on this. Are you using a RPM based distro? Can you reproduce this error easily? Can you explain more the steps to reproduce it?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53168</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-17 21:36:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tried to reproduce it on a Fedora system without any luck. Also tried to reproduce in a Fedora system with three simultaneous builds but couldn&apos;t regenerate the issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53365</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
      <attachid>2678</attachid>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-24 17:09:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 2678
Selftest for manifest files</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53366</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-24 17:11:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not able to reproduce the bug yet, nevertheless Paul can reproduce it very easily. The last comment contains a patch for a new selftest to check the manifest files against pkgdata. It needs some work but it&apos;s a start</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53396</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-25 22:53:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Mariano, would you send your patch to the list? I would like to send another one on top of yours.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53442</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-26 20:08:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Paul, I&apos;m a little confused with your manifests you&apos;re reporting here, when I build SDK (bitbake -c populate_sdk core-image-minimal) like you mention in the first comment, I get no manifests created in the DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE.

Is this the dir where you&apos;re seeing it?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53449</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-26 21:18:32 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A test for checking that all the lines of a manifest correspond to a package was proposed in:

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-August/109472.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53450</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-26 21:18:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Waiting on Paul&apos;s comments</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53457</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-26 22:07:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>${SDK_DEPLOY} is where you should see the manifests for built SDKs (along with the SDK itself) i.e. tmp/deploy/sdk.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53512</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-27 22:44:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks Paul, I checked ${SDK_DEPLOY} for the error you mention and I did not obtain it though. I will proceed to create the test for the manifest of the SDK as well, I expect to send the patch tomorrow.

In the meantime, any other pointer as to why you are able to obtain those error messages so easily?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53546</commentid>
    <comment_count>11</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-28 22:12:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Paul, under which context can SDK_DEPLOY be found? I believe oe self-tests execute bitbake -p and -e to get the variables but the get_bb_var(&apos;SDK_DEPLOY&apos;) fails to get it.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53552</commentid>
    <comment_count>12</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2015-08-29 11:32:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>You&apos;ll need to be querying it for an image (e.g. the one you&apos;ve built the SDK for) i.e. get_bb_var(&apos;SDK_DEPLOY&apos;, &apos;core-image-minimal&apos;)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53647</commentid>
    <comment_count>13</comment_count>
      <attachid>2702</attachid>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-03 04:26:00 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Created attachment 2702
oeqa.selftest.manifest.VerifyManifest tests log</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>53648</commentid>
    <comment_count>14</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-03 04:26:55 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>a patch V2 was sent to the list

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-September/109907.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54401</commentid>
    <comment_count>15</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-21 16:32:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A patch V3 will be required for modifying the test to ignore old manifests in the dir and avoid false negatives</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>54500</commentid>
    <comment_count>16</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-09-22 22:38:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>A pointer to look in the  meta/classes/testimage.bbclass, specifically the following line:

manifest = os.path.join(d.getVar(&quot;DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE&quot;, True), d.getVar(&quot;IMAGE_LINK_NAME&quot;, True) + &quot;.manifest&quot;)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>55043</commentid>
    <comment_count>17</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-07 19:45:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>patch V3

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-October/111348.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>55969</commentid>
    <comment_count>18</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-29 10:10:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>So, FYI this is still happening on my setup; also Benjamin&apos;s test does fail here as a result (as it should).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>56007</commentid>
    <comment_count>19</comment_count>
    <who name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</who>
    <bug_when>2015-10-29 15:02:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I wish I knew why your setup seems to have this failure reproduced often. Also, is there a way to check how many times this test has failed in the autobuilders and if so, access the logs?

we never got to see this issue in a number of machines in GDC including autobuilders.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>56325</commentid>
    <comment_count>20</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2015-11-09 14:48:56 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Setting back to IN PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION since it&apos;s been punted back to me to investigate.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57357</commentid>
    <comment_count>21</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-17 17:47:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I was able to reproduce this error today using openSuse. I just build a core-image-sato after core-image-full-cmdline. It seems the problem is that the rpm database is dirty after using _list_pkg_deps() from class RpmPkgsList in file package_manager.py.

_list_pkg_deps() calls rpmresolve and it seems this command leaves the locks in the database. The actual output of the rpm command is:

BDB2053 Freeing read locks for locker 0x98: 19853/140035173365568
BDB2053 Freeing read locks for locker 0x99: 19853/140035173365568
BDB2053 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9a: 19853/140035173365568
BDB2053 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9b: 19853/140035173365568
BDB2053 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9c: 19853/140035173365568
packagegroup-base-usbgadget genericx86_64 1.0 /path/to/tmp/deploy/rpm/genericx86_64/packagegroup-base-usbgadget-1.0-r83.genericx86_64.rpm
shadow-securetty genericx86_64 4.2.1 /path/to/tmp/deploy/rpm/genericx86_64/shadow-securetty-4.2.1-r3.genericx86_64.rpm
glibc-binary-localedata-en-gb core2_64 2.22 /path/to/tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64/glibc-binary-localedata-en-gb-2.22-r0.core2_64.rpm                                       
linux-firmware-iwlwifi-license all 0.0+git0+bbe4917c05 /path/to/tmp/deploy/rpm/all/linux-firmware-iwlwifi-license-0.0+git0+bbe4917c05-r0.all.rpm</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57359</commentid>
    <comment_count>22</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-17 18:03:07 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I created a different manifest after calling _list_pkg_deps() and every time I got the dirty output.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57486</commentid>
    <comment_count>23</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-29 18:03:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The issue is in rpmresolve program, there are some rpmmi pointers never freed when a package have null as requirement. This keeps the database opened after the program terminates.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57487</commentid>
    <comment_count>24</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-29 18:31:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Sent patch to the mailing list

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-December/114688.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57830</commentid>
    <comment_count>25</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2016-01-14 17:12:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Paul, patch has been integrated in master, can you confirm this solves the problem?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58186</commentid>
    <comment_count>26</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2016-01-25 14:49:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This has been solved in master with commit:

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=eda3947cf06252346dfd89f626b2560092219242

I&apos;ll backport the patch to jethro and fido</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>58763</commentid>
    <comment_count>27</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-09 00:34:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This has been integrated into jethro waiting for fido and dizzy

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=jethro&amp;id=d632a923dcd4646de827d1d2725d6699730f7feb</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59290</commentid>
    <comment_count>28</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-19 22:36:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This has been integrated in fido:

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=fido&amp;id=c94eb07d53c6bc26692dfb30aa7b006129f79d66

Waiting for dizzy</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59792</commentid>
    <comment_count>29</comment_count>
    <who name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-08 14:44:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Already talked with Armin, he said he will integrate the patch in the new pull request for dizzy</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63951</commentid>
    <comment_count>30</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-13 22:50:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This isn&apos;t yet integrated into Dizzy.  Armin: will you do that, or should we close this as resolved?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63955</commentid>
    <comment_count>31</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-13 23:30:27 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Patch sent for dizzy.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>66837</commentid>
    <comment_count>32</comment_count>
    <who name="Armin Kuster">akuster</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-03 19:41:43 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I am not planning on fixing this issue. Marking as wontfix.

There are several Yocto member&apos;s who provide commercial support and may be able to provide assistances on this issue.

https://www.yoctoproject.org/ecosystem/member-organizations.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>66838</commentid>
    <comment_count>33</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2016-10-03 19:48:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m re-marking this as fixed and changed the target milestone, since it was fixed in master and the newer stable branches.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="1"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>2678</attachid>
            <date>2015-08-24 17:09:06 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2015-08-24 17:09:06 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>Selftest for manifest files</desc>
            <filename>0001-selftest-manifest.py-Test-to-verify-rootfs-manifest.patch</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1756</size>
            <attacher name="Mariano Lopez">mariano.lopez</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">RnJvbSBlMTdiYjRiYzkwMmMyZmMxNDkxNWRlOTliZWQzNzk5OTk5MjRlMDM5IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg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==
</data>

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>2702</attachid>
            <date>2015-09-03 04:26:00 +0000</date>
            <delta_ts>2015-09-03 04:26:00 +0000</delta_ts>
            <desc>oeqa.selftest.manifest.VerifyManifest tests log</desc>
            <filename>file_8028.txt</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <size>1311</size>
            <attacher name="Benjamin Esquivel">benjamin.esquivel</attacher>
            
              <data encoding="base64">JCBvZS1zZWxmdGVzdCAtLXJ1bi10ZXN0cyBtYW5pZmVzdA0KMjAxNS0wOS0wMiAyMDoxMTo0OCwy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</data>

          </attachment>
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>