813 2011-03-06 23:11:45 +0000 bitbake can't parse a comment line that has a trailing backslash 2011-08-18 21:59:31 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BitBake bitbake 1.0 x86 Multiple VERIFIED NOTABUG Medium normal 1.0 M4 1 dexuan.cui richard.purdie gavian liping.ke poky.bs.watcher poky.watcher sgw --- --- --- oldest_to_newest 12319 0 dexuan.cui 2011-03-06 23:11:45 +0000 Liping and I happened to find such an issue when bitbaking the following recipe: adt-installer_svn.bb: LICENSE = "MIT" PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}" PR = "r0" #SRC_URI = "http://opkg.googlecode.com/files/opkg-0.1.8.tar.gz \ SRC_URI = "#svn://opkg.googlecode.com/svn;module=trunk;proto=http" $ bitbake adt-installer Loading cache: 100% |#############################################################################################################################################| ETA: 00:00:00 Loaded 971 entries from dependency cache. ERROR: Error parsing /osel/dcui/110304/p1/meta/recipes-kernel/oprofile/adt-installer_svn.bb: Failure expanding variable SRCPV, expression was ${@bb.fetch2.get_srcrev(d)} which triggered exception FetchError: Fetcher failure for URL: 'None'. SRCREV was used yet no valid SCM was found in SRC_URI Removing the trailing backslash of the commened SRC_URI line can resolve the ERROR, but we think this might be a parsing issue of bitbake we should fix? 12984 1 richard.purdie 2011-03-25 06:56:15 +0000 A backslash at the end of the line denotes a multi line. In this case bitbake parsed it as a multiline comment which was arguably the correct thing to do. This is a recent change in behavior to do with comment handling but it is consistent and behaving as intended. 13198 2 dexuan.cui 2011-04-10 22:45:43 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > A backslash at the end of the line denotes a multi line. In this case bitbake > parsed it as a multiline comment which was arguably the correct thing to do. > This is a recent change in behavior to do with comment handling but it is > consistent and behaving as intended. VERIFY the bug: NOTABUG. 15578 3 sgw 2011-08-18 21:59:31 +0000 *** Bug 1377 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***