<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>8778</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2015-12-07 13:56:35 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>RRS reports unknown upstream versions of gnutls and mesa, but local upstream check works</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-04-25 13:52:30 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>6</classification_id>
          <classification>Yocto Project Subprojects</classification>
          <product>Recipe Reporting System (RRS)</product>
          <component>Recipe Reporting System (RRS)</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium+</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.1 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Aníbal Limón">anibal.limon</assigned_to>
          <cc>benjamin.esquivel</cc>
    
    <cc>jku</cc>
    
    <cc>sgw</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57081</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-07 13:56:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Recipe reporting system has been reporting upstream versions for gnutls and mesa as &apos;UNKNOWN&apos; for a while now, but the same check using &apos;bitbake -c checkpkg&apos; works fine on my local machine (which is behind the intel proxy). 

Maybe the RRS server is not able to connect to those upstreams? They are:

ftp://ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa/
ftp://ftp.gnutls.org/gcrypt/gnutls/</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57086</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Jussi Kukkonen">jku</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-07 14:44:35 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I think there&apos;s something wrong with ftp.gnutls.org directory listing -- even with chrome or wget it often seems to stall indefinitely when listing files. Then at some point it might start working and then will keep working _from that client_ but not from others. 

Maybe they are reaching some maximum number of clients? (it&apos;s weird that it would exhibit like this but I can&apos;t think of anything else either)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57088</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-07 14:57:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>ftp.gnupg.org is the same IP address as ftp.gnutls.org, and RRS works for recipes that we fetch from ftp.gnupg.org - probably because there are actually mirrors listed for it. I&apos;ll update gnutls recipe to fetch from gnupg and see if it helps.

mesa still needs to be looked into. We also fetch libglu from ftp.freedesktop.org, but for that the upstream check succeeds.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57090</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-07 15:16:01 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Anibal, can you nevertheless still check what is the issue with gnutls now, because the above is just speculating, would be nice to know facts :)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57094</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Aníbal Limón">anibal.limon</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-07 16:12:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #3)
&gt; Anibal, can you nevertheless still check what is the issue with gnutls now,
&gt; because the above is just speculating, would be nice to know facts :)

Sure.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57143</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2015-12-09 14:35:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Same issue with unzip and zip recipes - locally upstream version are determined, but on RRS they are blank.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>57864</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Alexander Kanavin">alex.kanavin</who>
    <bug_when>2016-01-15 14:26:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>For gnupg and friends, let&apos;s switch to https://www.gnupg.org/ftp/GnuPG/
I&apos;ll make a patch.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60354</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Aníbal Limón">anibal.limon</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-23 17:43:21 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The missing upstream for gnutls and mesa recipes seems to be a Centos 7/Python 2.7.5 specific problem because in my development machine it (debian8/python 2.7.9) works. 


Some time ago i was experimenting some issues with regex&apos;es in production setup. 
I&apos;ll continue to figure out what is happen in production setup.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60407</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Aníbal Limón">anibal.limon</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-24 18:08:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In review at,

http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2016-March/007241.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60451</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Aníbal Limón">anibal.limon</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-28 17:17:22 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed at,

http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/bitbake?id=60656d07ea87e0c905c4b4c01a76a696af0d0c4e</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>