8949 2016-01-19 19:18:34 +0000 Build extensible SDK on autobuilder 2016-02-10 18:11:33 +0000 1 1 5 Infrastructure AutoBuilder autobuilder unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED High enhancement 2.1 M2 9091 1 bluelightning elizabeth.flanagan alexandru.c.georgescu elizabeth.flanagan infras.ab.watcher Infras.watcher anibal.limon --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 57968 0 bluelightning 2016-01-19 19:18:34 +0000 We need to start building the extensible SDK on the autobuilder, as we are building the standard SDK. This can be acheived by running the following: bitbake -c populate_sdk_ext <imagename> We can use core-image-minimal as the image for now. 58428 1 alexandru.c.georgescu 2016-02-02 11:11:32 +0000 Hi Beth, As I see now, we have the eSDK built on public AB for core-image-minimal. Can you also build for the core-image-sato-sdk? Thanks, AlexG 58449 2 anibal.limon 2016-02-02 14:18:35 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Beth, > As I see now, we have the eSDK built on public AB for core-image-minimal. > Can you also build for the core-image-sato-sdk? > > Thanks, > AlexG I guess it will be core-image-sato instead of core-image-sato-sdk... may be i'm wrong. 58470 3 bluelightning 2016-02-02 19:40:46 +0000 What are you hoping to test in addition with an SDK produced from core-image-sato? 58835 4 elizabeth.flanagan 2016-02-10 17:10:51 +0000 I'm marking this resolved for now. If you'd like to do core-image-sato for this, please open an additional bug.