<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>9130</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2016-02-17 20:02:04 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Update OE patchwork instance</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-07-29 17:22:20 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>6</classification_id>
          <classification>Yocto Project Subprojects</classification>
          <product>Patchwork/Patchtest</product>
          <component>Patchwork</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>VERIFIED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>High</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.2 M1</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>7684</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8714</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8715</blocked>
    
    <blocked>4078</blocked>
    
    <blocked>7654</blocked>
    
    <blocked>7656</blocked>
    
    <blocked>7658</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8442</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8648</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8649</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8704</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8716</blocked>
    
    <blocked>8717</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Michael Halstead">mhalstead</assigned_to>
          <cc>jose.perez.carranza</cc>
    
    <cc>richard.purdie</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Jose Perez C">jose.perez.carranza</qa_contact>
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>59165</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2016-02-17 20:02:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In order to take advantage of new functionality we&apos;d like to upgrade the OpenEmbedded patchwork instance at http://patchwork.openembedded.org/ using the fork available here:

  https://github.com/dlespiau/patchwork

For more information see the proposal I made late last year on the mailing list:

  http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-November/113433.html</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>62128</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Halstead">mhalstead</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-11 21:01:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>An upgraded version is up at http://patchwork-test.openembedded.org/ now and I am testing the patch state scripts on it. 

Since there are no releases for this fork I am running this commit from May 3: 2670f32dfd22dc4e60907b85365f48d47eb72456. Is this acceptable or do we need to routinely pull in new commits?

I&apos;d like help testing but I&apos;m not sure what to ask for as I don&apos;t use Patchwork routinely. 

I can pull from the production database and re-run the upgrade by request. There are certainly a few missing patches because of missed e-mail.

We are also potentially waiting for new hardware for the upgrade. I&apos;m waiting to hear back about the need for that versus upgrading in place.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63478</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Halstead">mhalstead</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-29 17:02:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Status update:
https://patchwork-next.openembedded.org/ is up and being tested. I&apos;m still resolving performance issues. Once those are solved this version can replace http://patchwork.openembedded.org/ as all existing functionality is working. Some of the new functionality, such as series creation, is still being looked at.

At this point I need help deciding on migrating the database from patchwork.oe.org to patchwork next again or not. It seems that that data in patchwork-next is still up to date with the current production version. Is that correct?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63725</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Richard Purdie">richard.purdie</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-07 15:01:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We&apos;ve updated to the new patchwork version now so can resolve this.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>64671</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Jose Perez C">jose.perez.carranza</who>
    <bug_when>2016-07-29 17:22:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Instance is up and running 

https://patchwork.openembedded.org/</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>